Applicant selection procedures for orthodontic specialty programs in the United States: survey of program directors
- PMID: 22133947
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.027
Applicant selection procedures for orthodontic specialty programs in the United States: survey of program directors
Abstract
Introduction: With the recent changes in scoring of the National Board Dental Examinations and grading systems in some dental schools, ranking prospective orthodontic applicants has become a challenge.
Methods: A 31-item survey was sent to orthodontic program directors in the United States to determine admission practices of all accredited specialty orthodontic programs.
Results: Forty-four of 64 program directors responded (69%). This study showed a wide variation of admission practices among these programs. The only consistent part of admissions in all programs was the interview process. The top factors considered for each applicant were interview ratings, dental school class rank, and letters of recommendation. The top sources of recommendations were the orthodontic department chair, the graduate program director, and the predoctoral orthodontic program director. The top 3 character traits considered most favorable were maturity, and good verbal and listening skills.
Conclusions: Accredited orthodontic programs in the United States follow different procedures in assessing applicants for admission. It is important to consider both academic and nonacademic measures in assessing applicant information in a standardized manner to ensure a fair and efficient selection process.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Factors influencing applicant ranking of orthodontic programs.Angle Orthod. 2006 Jan;76(1):84-91. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0084:FIAROO]2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 2006. PMID: 16448274
-
Applicant selection procedures in endodontic specialty programs in the United States: program director's perspective.J Endod. 2014 Jun;40(6):797-804. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Dec 19. J Endod. 2014. PMID: 24862706
-
Ten-year survey of program directors: trends, challenges, and mentoring in prosthodontics. Part 1.J Prosthodont. 2011 Oct;20(7):587-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00741.x. Epub 2011 Jul 20. J Prosthodont. 2011. PMID: 21777337
-
Minorities and the orthopaedic profession.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 May;(362):58-64. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999. PMID: 10335280 Review.
-
Advanced orthodontic education: evolution of assessment criteria and methods to meet future challenges.Angle Orthod. 2005 Mar;75(2):147-54. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)075<0143:AOEEOA>2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 2005. PMID: 15825775 Review.
Cited by
-
Predictors of orthodontic residency performance: An assessment of scholastic and demographic selection parameters.Angle Orthod. 2019 May;89(3):488-494. doi: 10.2319/062518-477.1. Epub 2019 Jan 2. Angle Orthod. 2019. PMID: 30605016 Free PMC article.
-
Life satisfaction of Taiwanese dental graduates received residencies in the U.S.: a cross-sectional study.BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 28;20(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02032-5. BMC Med Educ. 2020. PMID: 32345306 Free PMC article.
-
Perspectives from program directors on the selection process for Saudi periodontics residency programs: a cross-sectional study.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 5;24(1):1258. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06241-0. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39501273 Free PMC article.
-
Selection process for orthodontic program applicants in Saudi Arabia: A survey of program directors.J Orthod Sci. 2025 Jun 10;14:27. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_3_25. eCollection 2025. J Orthod Sci. 2025. PMID: 40630781 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical