Safety and efficacy of clindamycin phosphate 1.2%-benzoyl peroxide 3% fixed-dose combination gel for the treatment of acne vulgaris: a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active- and vehicle-controlled study
- PMID: 22134562
Safety and efficacy of clindamycin phosphate 1.2%-benzoyl peroxide 3% fixed-dose combination gel for the treatment of acne vulgaris: a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active- and vehicle-controlled study
Abstract
Background: Topical fixed-combination therapy containing 1% clindamycin as 1.2% clindamycin phosphate (CLNP) and 3% benzoyl peroxide (BPO) is an effective treatment for acne vulgaris (acne).
Objectives: To demonstrate that the combination of 1.2% CLNP with lower strength BPO (CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3%) in a gel formulation is superior to each individual ingredient, CLNP 1.2% and BPO 3%, and vehicle gel.
Methods: A total of 1,319 patients with acne, aged 12 years or older, were enrolled and randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3%, CLNP 1.2% gel, BPO 3% gel, or vehicle gel once-daily in a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, vehicle-controlled study. Subjects were evaluated at baseline, weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 or early termination. Assessment of efficacy was evaluated using a six-point Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) and Subject's Global Assessment (SGA) of acne severity and lesion counts (inflammatory, non-inflammatory, and total). Safety assessments included skin tolerability and adverse events (AEs).
Results: A greater proportion of subjects who used CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3% gel (39%) had a two grade improvement in ISGA from baseline to week 12 compared with CLNP 1.2% (25%; P<0.001), BPO 3% (30%; P=0.016), and vehicle (18%; P<0.001). CLNP 1.2%- BPO 3% was superior to CLNP 1.2% and vehicle alone in the absolute reduction from baseline to week 12 in all three lesion types (P<0.001 all pair-wise comparisons). CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3% was superior to BPO 3% alone in the absolute reduction from baseline to week 12 in inflammatory (P=0.015) and total (P=0.032) lesion counts. The incidence of product-related AEs was low and similar in all study groups (1% with CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3%, 2% with CLNP 1.2%, 2% with BPO 3%, and 2% with vehicle). Local tolerability assessments showed similar minimal changes from baseline to week 12 in all study groups.
Conclusion: CLNP 1.2%-BPO 3% gel provides superior efficacy to improve ISGA score and reduce inflammatory and total lesion counts compared with the individual active ingredients (CLNP 1.2% and BPO 3%) and vehicle, while maintaining a highly favorable safety and tolerability profile similar to BPO 3% alone.
Similar articles
-
Clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/benzoyl peroxide 3% fixed-dose combination gel versus topical combination therapy of adapalene 0.1% gel and clindamycin phosphate 1.2% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris in Japanese patients: A multicenter, randomized, investigator-blind, parallel-group study.J Dermatol. 2018 Aug;45(8):951-962. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.14497. Epub 2018 Jun 15. J Dermatol. 2018. PMID: 29905384 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Clindamycin phosphate 1·2%-benzoyl peroxide 3·0% fixed-dose combination gel has an effective and acceptable safety and tolerability profile for the treatment of acne vulgaris in Japanese patients: a phase III, multicentre, randomised, single-blinded, active-controlled, parallel-group study.Br J Dermatol. 2015 Feb;172(2):494-503. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13265. Epub 2015 Jan 7. Br J Dermatol. 2015. PMID: 25040180 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and tolerability of fixed-combination acne treatment in adolescents.Cutis. 2013 Mar;91(3):152-9. Cutis. 2013. PMID: 23617089 Clinical Trial.
-
Adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel: a review of its use in the treatment of acne vulgaris in patients aged ≥ 12 years.Am J Clin Dermatol. 2011 Dec 1;12(6):407-20. doi: 10.2165/11208170-000000000-00000. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2011. PMID: 21967116 Review.
-
Advancement in benzoyl peroxide-based acne treatment: methods to increase both efficacy and tolerability.J Drugs Dermatol. 2009 Jul;8(7):657-61. J Drugs Dermatol. 2009. PMID: 19588642 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical efficacy and safety of benzoyl peroxide for acne vulgaris: Comparison between Japanese and Western patients.J Dermatol. 2017 Nov;44(11):1212-1218. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.13996. Epub 2017 Aug 9. J Dermatol. 2017. PMID: 28791735 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Topical benzoyl peroxide for acne.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 16;3(3):CD011154. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011154.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32175593 Free PMC article.
-
Acne Management Guidelines by the Dermatological Society of Singapore.J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2019 Jul;12(7):34-50. Epub 2019 Jul 1. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2019. PMID: 31531161 Free PMC article.
-
Clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/benzoyl peroxide 3% fixed-dose combination gel versus topical combination therapy of adapalene 0.1% gel and clindamycin phosphate 1.2% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris in Japanese patients: A multicenter, randomized, investigator-blind, parallel-group study.J Dermatol. 2018 Aug;45(8):951-962. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.14497. Epub 2018 Jun 15. J Dermatol. 2018. PMID: 29905384 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Synergy between Pharmacological Regimens and Dermocosmetics and Its Impact on Adherence in Acne Treatment.Dermatol Res Pract. 2022 Aug 9;2022:3644720. doi: 10.1155/2022/3644720. eCollection 2022. Dermatol Res Pract. 2022. PMID: 35982914 Free PMC article. Review.