Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2011 Dec;43(12):1059-86.
doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291430. Epub 2011 Dec 1.

Participation in colorectal cancer screening trials after first-time invitation: a systematic review

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Participation in colorectal cancer screening trials after first-time invitation: a systematic review

C Khalid-de Bakker et al. Endoscopy. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Background and study aim: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is implemented by an increasing number of countries. Participation rates of screening programs influence the health benefit and cost-effectiveness of the applied method. The aim was to systematically review participation rate after first-time invitation for CRC screening with fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, and/or computed tomography (CT) colonography.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed prior to October 1 2009. Prospective CRC screening studies of unselected populations reporting participation rates were included.

Results: After meta-analyses, overall participation rates were found to be 47 % for FOBT, 42 % for fecal immunologic tests (FITs), 35 % for sigmoidoscopy, 41 % for sigmoidoscopy combined with FIT/FOBT, 28 % for colonoscopy, and 22 % for CT colonography. Studies comparing screening methods showed higher participation rates for less invasive methods. Studies comparing invitation methods showed higher participation rates with general practitioner involvement, a more personalized recruitment approach, and reduction of barriers that discourage participation.

Conclusions: Knowledge of identified factors affecting CRC screening participation can be used to improve screening programs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources