Umbilical arterial blood gas and perinatal outcome in the second twin according to the planned mode of delivery
- PMID: 22135609
- PMCID: PMC3204432
- DOI: 10.7150/ijms.8.643
Umbilical arterial blood gas and perinatal outcome in the second twin according to the planned mode of delivery
Abstract
Purpose: To compare umbilical arterial gas parameters in the second twin of twin pregnancies according to the mode of delivery.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of twin deliveries after 34 weeks of gestation for 3 years. Excluding the cases which underwent emergency cesarean delivery during trial of labor, a total of 79 twin gestations had umbilical arterial blood gas values available and were and divided into cesarean delivery group (N=40) and vaginal delivery group (N=39). The mean differences of umbilical arterial blood parameters and the Apgar score between the first and second twin in each pregnancy were compared according the mode of delivery.
Results: The differences of umbilical arterial gas parameters between twin siblings showed no significant difference according to the mode of delivery. With regard to the 1 minute and 5 minute Apgar scores, the differences between twin siblings are significantly increased in vaginal delivery group compared to cesarean delivery group (p=0.048, and p=0.038, respectively). In comparing the 28 cases delivered vaginally with an inter-twin delivery interval < 10 minutes and 40 cases delivered by cesarean section, no significant differences were observed in the umbilical arterial gas parameters and Apgar scores.
Conclusion: The inter-twin umbilical arterial blood gas parameters according to the mode of delivery showed no difference. For twin deliveries, it is relatively safe to plan for a vaginal delivery, but an effort should be made to reduce the inter-twin delivery interval time.
Keywords: cesarean delivery; inter-twin delivery interval; twin pregnancy; umbilical arterial gas parameters; vaginal delivery.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Similar articles
-
Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):695-703. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318163c435. Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18310373
-
Effect of inter-twin delivery interval on umbilical artery pH and Apgar score in the second twin.Birth. 2018 Mar;45(1):37-42. doi: 10.1111/birt.12317. Epub 2017 Nov 2. Birth. 2018. PMID: 29094369
-
Retrospective evaluation of attempted vaginal deliveries in dichorionic twin pregnancies.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Jun;303(6):1461-1468. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05882-y. Epub 2020 Nov 21. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021. PMID: 33222039 Free PMC article.
-
Trial of labor after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;220(4):336-347. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.125. Epub 2018 Nov 19. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30465748
-
Twin Deliveries - East Meets West.Matern Fetal Med. 2022 Aug 9;4(4):251-254. doi: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000108. eCollection 2022 Oct. Matern Fetal Med. 2022. PMID: 40406690 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Boggess KA, Chisholm CA. Delivery of the nonvertex second twin: a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1997;52:728–35. - PubMed
-
- de Veciana M, Major C, Morgan MA. Labor and delivery management of the multiple gestation. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1995;22:235–46. - PubMed
-
- Ferguson WF. Perinatal mortality in multiple gestations: a review of perinatal deaths from 1609 multiple gestations. Obstet Gynecol. 1964;23:861–70. - PubMed
-
- Ware HH 3rd. The second twin. Am J Obstet Genecol. 1971;110:865–73. - PubMed
-
- Usta IM, Nassar AH, Awwad JT. et al. Comparison of the perinatal morbidity and mortality of the presenting twin and its co-twin. J Perinatol. 2002;22:391–6. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources