Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;61(593):e821-35.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X613160.

Interventions to reduce primary care delay in cancer referral: a systematic review

Affiliations

Interventions to reduce primary care delay in cancer referral: a systematic review

Gemma Mansell et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Reducing delay in the primary care part of the cancer care pathway is likely to improve cancer survival. Identifying effective interventions in primary care would allow action by primary healthcare professionals and local commissioners to reduce delay.

Aim: To identify interventions that reduce primary care delay in the referral of patients with cancer to secondary care.

Design and setting: Systematic review in primary care.

Method: Eight electronic databases were searched using terms for primary care, cancer, and delay. Exclusion criteria included screening and the 2-week-wait referral system. Reference lists of relevant papers were hand searched. The quality of each paper was assessed using predefined criteria, and checked by a second reviewer.

Results: Searches identified 1798 references, of which 22 papers were found to meet the criteria. Interventions concerning education, audit and feedback, decision support software and guideline use, diagnostic tools, and other specific skills training were identified. Most studies reported a positive effect on their specified outcomes, although no study measured a direct effect on reducing delay.

Conclusion: There was no evidence that any intervention directly reduced primary care delay in the diagnosis of cancer. Limited evidence suggests that complex interventions, including audit and feedback and specific skills training, have the potential to do so.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of search.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Richards MA, Westcombe AM, Love SB, et al. Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. Lancet. 1999;353(9159):1119–1127. - PubMed
    1. Neal RD. Do diagnostic delays in cancer matter? Br J Cancer. 2009;101(suppl 2):S9–S12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Neal RD, Allgar VL, Ali N, et al. Stage, survival and delays in lung, colorectal, prostate and ovarian cancer: comparision between diagnostic routes. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(536):212–219. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Macdonald S, Macleod U, Mitchell E, et al. Factors influencing patient and primary care delay in the diagnosis of cancer: a database of existing research and its implications for future practice. Report to the Department of Health, Cancer Symptom Profiles and Referral Strategies for Primary Care Research Programme 2004. Project Ref 1217522.
    1. Department of Health. The NHS cancer plan. London: Department of Health; 2000.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources