Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data
- PMID: 22137798
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61294-4
Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data
Erratum in
- Lancet. 2012 Mar 24;379(9821):1102
Abstract
Background: Uptake of self-testing and self-management of oral anticoagulation [corrected] has remained inconsistent, despite good evidence of their effectiveness. To clarify the value of self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation, we did a meta-analysis of individual patient data addressing several important gaps in the evidence, including an estimate of the effect on time to death, first major haemorrhage, and thromboembolism.
Methods: We searched Ovid versions of Embase (1980-2009) and Medline (1966-2009), limiting searches to randomised trials with a maximally sensitive strategy. We approached all authors of included trials and requested individual patient data: primary outcomes were time to death, first major haemorrhage, and first thromboembolic event. We did prespecified subgroup analyses according to age, type of control-group care (anticoagulation-clinic care vs primary care), self-testing alone versus self-management, and sex. We analysed patients with mechanical heart valves or atrial fibrillation separately. We used a random-effect model method to calculate pooled hazard ratios and did tests for interaction and heterogeneity, and calculated a time-specific number needed to treat.
Findings: Of 1357 abstracts, we included 11 trials with data for 6417 participants and 12,800 person-years of follow-up. We reported a significant reduction in thromboembolic events in the self-monitoring group (hazard ratio 0·51; 95% CI 0·31-0·85) but not for major haemorrhagic events (0·88, 0·74-1·06) or death (0·82, 0·62-1·09). Participants younger than 55 years showed a striking reduction in thrombotic events (hazard ratio 0·33, 95% CI 0·17-0·66), as did participants with mechanical heart valve (0·52, 0·35-0·77). Analysis of major outcomes in the very elderly (age ≥85 years, n=99) showed no significant adverse effects of the intervention for all outcomes.
Interpretation: Our analysis showed that self-monitoring and self-management of oral coagulation is a safe option for suitable patients of all ages. Patients should also be offered the option to self-manage their disease with suitable health-care support as back-up.
Funding: UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Technology Assessment Programme, UK NIHR National School for Primary Care Research.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Vitamin K antagonists: self-determination by self-monitoring?Lancet. 2012 Jan 28;379(9813):292-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61748-0. Epub 2011 Nov 30. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 22137797 No abstract available.
-
Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation reduces thromboembolic events and does not increase risk of bleeding in selected patients and settings.Evid Based Med. 2012 Dec;17(6):e14. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2012-100634. Epub 2012 Apr 17. Evid Based Med. 2012. PMID: 22511641 No abstract available.
-
Self-monitoring of anticoagulation.Lancet. 2012 May 12;379(9828):1788-9; author reply 1789. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60757-0. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 22579317 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
