NCCN Task Force report: Evaluating the clinical utility of tumor markers in oncology
- PMID: 22138009
- DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2011.0137
NCCN Task Force report: Evaluating the clinical utility of tumor markers in oncology
Abstract
The molecular analysis of biomarkers in oncology is rapidly advancing, but the incorporation of new molecular tests into clinical practice will require a greater understanding of the genetic changes that drive malignancy, the assays used to measure the resulting phenotypes and genotypes, and the regulatory processes that new molecular biomarkers must face to be accepted for clinical use. To address these issues and provide an overview of current molecular testing in 6 major malignancies, including glioma, breast cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, and acute myelogenous leukemia, an NCCN Task Force was convened on the topic of evaluating the clinical utility of tumor markers in oncology. The output of this meeting, contained within this report, describes the ways biomarkers have been developed and used; defines common terminology, including prognostic, predictive, and companion diagnostic markers, and analytic validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility; and proposes the use of a combination level of evidence score to aid in the evaluation of novel biomarker tests as they arise. The current state of regulatory oversight and anticipated changes in the regulation of molecular testing are also addressed.
Similar articles
-
HER2 testing in breast cancer: NCCN Task Force report and recommendations.J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2006 Jul;4 Suppl 3:S1-22; quiz S23-4. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2006. PMID: 16813731 Review.
-
NCCN molecular testing white paper: effectiveness, efficiency, and reimbursement.J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011 Dec;9 Suppl 6:S1-16. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2011.0138. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011. PMID: 22203777
-
Biomarkers for personalized oncology: recent advances and future challenges.Metabolism. 2015 Mar;64(3 Suppl 1):S16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.10.027. Epub 2014 Oct 30. Metabolism. 2015. PMID: 25468140 Review.
-
Clinical Neuropathology Practice News 4-2012: levels of evidence for brain tumor biomarkers.Clin Neuropathol. 2012 Jul-Aug;31(4):206-9. doi: 10.5414/np300511. Clin Neuropathol. 2012. PMID: 22720693 Free PMC article.
-
NCCN Oncology Research Program's Investigator Steering Committee and NCCN Best Practices Committee Molecular Profiling Surveys.J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015 Nov;13(11):1337-46. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0163. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015. PMID: 26553764
Cited by
-
Blood Biomarkers of Glioma in Response Assessment Including Pseudoprogression and Other Treatment Effects: A Systematic Review.Front Oncol. 2020 Aug 14;10:1191. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01191. eCollection 2020. Front Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32923382 Free PMC article.
-
NOHA: A Promising Biomarker for Determining Estrogen Receptor Status Among Patients With Breast Cancer in Resource-Constrained Settings.JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 Dec;8:e2200192. doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00192. JCO Glob Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36542825 Free PMC article.
-
A detailed clinicopathologic study of ALK-translocated papillary thyroid carcinoma.Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 May;39(5):652-9. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000368. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015. PMID: 25501013 Free PMC article.
-
The Prognostic Value of Microsatellite Instability, KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA Mutations in Stage II Colon Cancer Patients.Mol Med. 2016 May;21(1):1038-1046. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2015.00220. Epub 2016 May 9. Mol Med. 2016. PMID: 26716438 Free PMC article.
-
Generating and evaluating evidence of the clinical utility of molecular diagnostic tests in oncology.Genet Med. 2016 Aug;18(8):780-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.162. Epub 2015 Dec 3. Genet Med. 2016. PMID: 26633547
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources