Economic evaluation of genomic test-directed chemotherapy for early-stage lymph node-positive breast cancer
- PMID: 22138097
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr484
Economic evaluation of genomic test-directed chemotherapy for early-stage lymph node-positive breast cancer
Abstract
Background: Multi-parameter genomic tests identify patients with early-stage breast cancer who are likely to derive little benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. These tests can potentially spare patients the morbidity from unnecessary chemotherapy and reduce costs. However, the costs of the test must be balanced against the health benefits and cost savings produced. This economic evaluation compared genomic test-directed chemotherapy using the Oncotype DX 21-gene assay with chemotherapy for all eligible patients with lymph node-positive, estrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer.
Methods: We performed a cost-utility analysis using a state transition model to calculate expected costs and benefits over the lifetime of a cohort of women with estrogen receptor-positive lymph node-positive breast cancer from a UK perspective. Recurrence rates for Oncotype DX-selected risk groups were derived from parametric survival models fitted to data from the Southwest Oncology Group 8814 trial. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, expressed as the cost (in 2011 GBP) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Confidence in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was expressed as a probability of cost-effectiveness and was calculated using Monte Carlo simulation. Model parameters were varied deterministically and probabilistically in sensitivity analysis. Value of information analysis was used to rank priorities for further research.
Results: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for Oncotype DX-directed chemotherapy using a recurrence score cutoff of 18 was £5529 (US $8852) per QALY. The probability that test-directed chemotherapy is cost-effective was 0.61 at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30 000 per QALY. Results were sensitive to the recurrence rate, long-term anthracycline-related cardiac toxicity, quality of life, test cost, and the time horizon. The highest priority for further research identified by value of information analysis is the recurrence rate in test-selected subgroups.
Conclusions: There is substantial uncertainty regarding the cost-effectiveness of Oncotype DX-directed chemotherapy. It is particularly important that future research studies to inform cost-effectiveness-based decisions collect long-term outcome data.
Similar articles
-
Societal cost-effectiveness analysis of the 21-gene assay in estrogen-receptor-positive, lymph-node-negative early-stage breast cancer in Japan.BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 5;14:372. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-372. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014. PMID: 25190451 Free PMC article.
-
Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jun;23(30):1-328. doi: 10.3310/hta23300. Health Technol Assess. 2019. PMID: 31264581 Free PMC article.
-
Incorporating Tumor Characteristics to Maximize 21-Gene Assay Utility: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jan;17(1):39-46. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7077. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019. PMID: 30659128
-
Irish national real-world analysis of the clinical and economic impact of 21-gene oncotype DX® testing in early-stage, 1-3 lymph node-positive, oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, breast cancer.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jan;209(1):189-199. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07486-5. Epub 2024 Oct 4. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025. PMID: 39365509 Free PMC article.
-
[Cost-Effectiveness of the 21 Gene Assay in Patients with Node-Positive Breast Cancer].Gesundheitswesen. 2016 Nov;78(11):772-780. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549989. Epub 2015 Jun 24. Gesundheitswesen. 2016. PMID: 26107965 Review. German.
Cited by
-
The value of comparative effectiveness research: projected return on investment of the RxPONDER trial (SWOG S1007).Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Nov;33(6):1117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.08.006. Epub 2012 Aug 18. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012. PMID: 22981891 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of prognostic gene expression signature-based stratification of early breast cancer patients.Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Feb;33(2):179-90. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0227-x. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015. PMID: 25404424 Free PMC article.
-
Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(10):1-234. eCollection 2020. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020. PMID: 32284770 Free PMC article.
-
Differential patterns of recurrence and specific survival between luminal A and luminal B breast cancer according to recent changes in the 2013 St Gallen immunohistochemical classification.Clin Transl Oncol. 2015 Mar;17(3):238-46. doi: 10.1007/s12094-014-1220-8. Epub 2014 Oct 1. Clin Transl Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25270605
-
Assessing cost-utility of predictive biomarkers in oncology: a streamlined approach.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jan;155(2):223-34. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3677-3. Epub 2016 Jan 9. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016. PMID: 26749360 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials