Usefulness of 18F-FDG uptake with clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical prognostic factors in breast cancer
- PMID: 22139552
- DOI: 10.1007/s12149-011-0556-1
Usefulness of 18F-FDG uptake with clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical prognostic factors in breast cancer
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical significance of maxSUV with clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical prognostic factors in patients with primary breast cancer.
Methods: Ninety-one women (48.5 ± 11.2 years of age) with breast cancer who underwent (18)F-FDG PET (PET) before surgery were recruited. All of the breast cancers were invasive ductal carcinomas and ≥1 cm in size to exclude a partial volume effect. The maxSUV of breast cancers was compared with histopathologic and immunohistochemical findings. Additionally, the ability of PET to discriminate axillary nodal status (ANS) and correlation between ANS and tumor characteristics were evaluated.
Results: A high maxSUV of breast cancer was significantly correlated with the following poor prognosis factors: tumor invasiveness >2 cm (2.9 vs. 5.4; p < 0.001); high score of nuclear (3.5 vs. 5.3; p = 0.008) or histologic grade (3.3 vs. 5.5; p < 0.001); MIB-1 ≥10% (3.0 vs. 4.9; p < 0.002); ER-negativity (4.8 vs. 3.8; p = 0.019); PR-negativity (5.0 vs. 3.6; p = 0.029); and triple negativity (ER-, PR-, and c-erbB-2-negative; 5.3 vs. 3.8; p < 0.016). MaxSUV was not affected by menopausal status, ANS, lymphovascular invasion, including CD34 and D2-40 (LVIs), p53, and c-erbB-2 status. Additionally, the sensitivity and specificity of PET for discriminating ANS were 51.1 and 97.8%, respectively. ANS was correlated with tumor invasiveness >2 cm (p = 0.046), LVIs (all of variables; p < 0.001), and triple negativity (p = 0.049).
Conclusions: A high FDG uptake of breast tumor is correlated with several poor prognosis factors, such as tumor invasiveness >2 cm, higher tumor grade, higher MIB-1, hormonal receptor negativity, and triple negativity. However, PET has a limited value in discriminating axillary lymph nodes. Pre-operative PET is a useful modality to predict biologic poor prognosis factors which could affect adjunctive therapy of breast cancer.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.Cancer. 2008 Mar 1;112(5):995-1000. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23226. Cancer. 2008. PMID: 18098228 Clinical Trial.
-
Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma.World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar 15;13:113. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0522-9. World J Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25889560 Free PMC article.
-
Clinicopathological and prognostic relevance of uptake level using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in primary breast cancer.Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr;38(4):250-8. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyn019. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18407934
-
Molecular imaging using PET for breast cancer.Breast Cancer. 2016 Jan;23(1):24-32. doi: 10.1007/s12282-015-0613-z. Epub 2015 Apr 28. Breast Cancer. 2016. PMID: 25917108 Review.
-
Biological characterisation of breast cancer by means of PET.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004 Jun;31 Suppl 1:S80-7. doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1529-6. Epub 2004 May 4. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004. PMID: 15127240 Review.
Cited by
-
Which of the fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computerized tomography parameters are better associated with prognostic factors in breast cancer?Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(22):e15925. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015925. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31145358 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the association between HIF-1α and HER-2 expression, hormone receptor status, Ki-67 expression, histology and tumor FDG uptake in breast cancer.Oncol Lett. 2016 Nov;12(5):3889-3895. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.5199. Epub 2016 Sep 28. Oncol Lett. 2016. PMID: 27895745 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship between 18-FDG-PET/CT and Clinicopathological Features and Pathological Responses in Patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancers.Eurasian J Med. 2019 Jun;51(2):154-159. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2018.18036. Eurasian J Med. 2019. PMID: 31258356 Free PMC article.
-
PET/CT and breast cancer subtypes.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Sep;40(9):1301-3. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2472-1. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23748238 No abstract available.
-
Prognostic Significance of Metabolic Tumor Volume Measured by (18)F-FDG PET/CT in Operable Primary Breast Cancer.Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Dec;46(4):278-85. doi: 10.1007/s13139-012-0161-9. Epub 2012 Aug 25. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012. PMID: 24900075 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous