Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb;24(1):95-9.
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr077. Epub 2011 Dec 2.

Process analysis to reduce MRI access time at a German University Hospital

Affiliations

Process analysis to reduce MRI access time at a German University Hospital

S Tokur et al. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Quality problem or issue: Long access times for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can negatively impact the quality of care provided to patients. We investigated improving access by reducing MRI processing time.

Initial assessment: Data were collected for scans (n= 360) performed over 3 weeks (April-May 2008) at the University Hospital of Mannheim, Germany. Average access time, excluding emergencies, was 44 (±44) days for outpatients and 3 (±5) days for inpatients. Factors influencing total MRI processing time were identified using multivariate linear regression. In addition to region scanned, the total MRI processing time was significantly related to performing multiple scans (β = 33.57, P< 0.01), using oral contrast media (β = 13.58, P< 0.01), placing an intravenous (IV) catheter (β = 5.00, P= 0.04) and scanning patients ≤8 years old (β = 0.41, P= 0.03). Contrary to prior perceptions, emergency cases (5.6%) and late arrivals (12.8% >5 min late) were less than expected.

Choice of solution: Increasing scheduling flexibility to address non-modifiable process variation and completing preparatory activities outside the scanner room were identified as process improvement targets.

Implementation: Scheduling was adapted to utilize three expected total MRI processing times and IV placement was moved outside the scanner room.

Evaluation: Planned hardware and software upgrades were completed concurrent to the process improvements. As a result, it was not possible to accurately measure the effect of implementing the scheduling and preparatory activity changes.

Lessons learned: Clinical study team members' prior perceptions of workflow obstacles did not match the study findings. Utilizing insiders and outsiders during process analysis may limit bias in identification of process improvement opportunities.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms