TRAP abortion laws and partisan political party control of state government
- PMID: 22141177
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2011.00794.x
TRAP abortion laws and partisan political party control of state government
Abstract
Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (or TRAP) laws impose medically unnecessary and burdensome regulations solely on abortion providers in order to make abortion services more expensive and difficult to obtain. Using event history analysis, this article examines the determinants of the enactment of a TRAP law by states over the period 1974–2008. The empirical results find that Republican institutional control of a state's legislative/executive branches is positively associated with a state enacting a TRAP law, while Democratic institutional control is negatively associated with a state enacting a TRAP law. The percentage of a state's population that is Catholic, public anti-abortion attitudes, state political ideology, and the abortion rate in a state are statistically insignificant predictors of a state enacting a TRAP law. The empirical results are consistent with the hypothesis that abortion is a redistributive issue and not a morality issue.
Similar articles
-
Politics, religion and gender equality in contemporary Mexico: women's sexuality and reproductive rights in a contested secular state.Third World Q. 2010;31(6):989-1005. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2010.502733. Third World Q. 2010. PMID: 20857573
-
Abortion law reforms in Colombia and Nicaragua: issue networks and opportunity contexts.Dev Change. 2011;42(3):805-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01714.x. Dev Change. 2011. PMID: 22069803
-
The politics of death: from abortion to health care - how the hysterical style overtook the national debate.New Yorker. 2009 Nov:60-7. New Yorker. 2009. PMID: 21692358 No abstract available.
-
The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.J Policy Anal Manage. 1993 Summer;12(3):498-511. J Policy Anal Manage. 1993. PMID: 10127357 Review.
-
From Roe to Dobbs: 50 Years of Cause and Effect of US State Abortion Regulations.Annu Rev Public Health. 2025 Apr;46(1):433-446. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071823-122011. Epub 2024 Oct 30. Annu Rev Public Health. 2025. PMID: 39476414 Review.
Cited by
-
Medication Abortion "Reversal" Laws: How Unsound Science Paved the Way for Dangerous Abortion Policy.Am J Public Health. 2023 Feb;113(2):202-212. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307140. Am J Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36652652 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes toward abortion, social welfare programs, and gender roles in the U.S. and South Africa.Crit Public Health. 2020;30(4):441-456. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2019.1601683. Epub 2019 Apr 19. Crit Public Health. 2020. PMID: 35368244 Free PMC article.
-
Constructing a longitudinal database of targeted regulation of abortion providers laws.Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):1084-1089. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13185. Epub 2019 Jun 17. Health Serv Res. 2019. PMID: 31206632 Free PMC article.
-
Abortion Restrictions and the Impact on Families.JAMA Pediatr. 2024 Jan 1;178(1):15-16. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.4735. JAMA Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 37930685 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Abortion travel within the United States: An observational study of cross-state movement to obtain abortion care in 2017.Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Mar 4;10:100214. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100214. eCollection 2022 Jun. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022. PMID: 36777689 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical