Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Dec;13(12):917-24.
doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00549.x. Epub 2011 Nov 7.

Carvedilol reduces aortic wave reflection and improves left ventricular/vascular coupling: a comparison with atenolol (CENTRAL Study)

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Carvedilol reduces aortic wave reflection and improves left ventricular/vascular coupling: a comparison with atenolol (CENTRAL Study)

Niren K Shah et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) characteristics, such as central aortic pressure and arterial stiffness, independently predict cardiovascular events. The effects of pharmacologically dissimilar β-blockers on these properties have not been fully elucidated. Patients with essential hypertension and without significant concomitant cardiovascular disease were randomly assigned to controlled-release carvedilol, force-titrated to 80 mg (n=22), or atenolol, force-titrated to 100 mg (n=19); each was given once daily for 4 weeks. Baseline characteristics were similar. At the end of week 4, atenolol and carvedilol reduced central and brachial systolic and diastolic BP to a similar extent. Central augmentation index was increased in atenolol-treated patients but not carvedilol-treated patients (atenolol 4.47% vs carvedilol -0.68%; P=.04). Mean augmented central aortic pressure increased slightly during atenolol treatment (+1.1 mm Hg) but decreased slightly during carvedilol treatment (-1.1 mm Hg), although the difference in these changes was not statistically significant (P=.23). Pulse pressure amplification was reduced more with atenolol at week 4 (atenolol -10.7% vs carvedilol -1.8%; P=.02). Therefore, we conclude that carvedilol results in more favorable pulse pressure amplification and augmentation index by increasing arterial compliance and reducing the magnitude of wave reflection, respectively, compared with atenolol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of patient enrollment and randomization. CR indicates controlled release.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in wave reflection properties from baseline to week 2 and 4 in patients taking atenolol 100 mg or extended‐release carvedilol 80 mg. bpm indicates beats per minute; HR, heart rate. *P<.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR,et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560–2572. - PubMed
    1. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. ESH‐ESC task force on the management of arterial hypertension. 2007 ESH‐ESC practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: ESH‐ESC task force on the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 2007;25:1751–1762. - PubMed
    1. National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions . Hypertension: Management in Adults in Primary Care: Pharmacological Update. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2006. - PubMed
    1. Williams B, Lacy PS, Thom SM, et al. Differential impact of blood pressure–lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: principal results of the conduit artery function evaluation (CAFE) study. Circulation. 2006;113:1213–1225. - PubMed
    1. Carlberg B, Samuelsson O, Lindholm LH. Atenolol in hypertension: is it a wise choice? Lancet. 2004;364:1684–1689. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms