Prognostic value of the quantitative metabolic volumetric measurement on 18F-FDG PET/CT in Stage IV nonsurgical small-cell lung cancer
- PMID: 22142679
- DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.08.020
Prognostic value of the quantitative metabolic volumetric measurement on 18F-FDG PET/CT in Stage IV nonsurgical small-cell lung cancer
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: Stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) consists of a heterogeneous group of patients with different prognoses. We assessed the prognostic value of baseline whole body tumor burden as measured by metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and standardized uptake values (SUV(max) and SUV(mean)) of all tumors in nonsurgical patients with Stage IV NSCLC.
Materials and methods: Ninety-two consecutive patients with newly diagnosed Stage IV NSCLC who had a pretreatment F-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan were retrospectively reviewed. The MTV, TLG, SUV(mean), and SUV(max) of whole-body (WB) tumors were measured with the MIMvista workstation with manual adjustment.
Results: There was a statistically significant association between overall survival (OS) and ln(MTV)/ln(TLG) at the level of WB tumor burden (MTV(WB)) and of primary tumor (MTV(T)). The hazard ratio (HR) for a 1-unit increase of ln(MTV(WB)) and ln(MTV(T)) before and after adjusting for age and gender was 1.48/1.48 (both P < .001) and 1.25/1.25 (P = .006, .007), respectively. The HR for a 1-unit increase of ln(TLG(WB)) and ln(TLG(T)) before and after adjusting for age and gender was 1.37/1.37 (both P = .001) and 1.19/1.19 (P = .001, .017), respectively. There was no statistically significant association between OS and ln(SUV(max)) and ln(SUV(mean)) at WB tumor burden, primary tumor, nodal metastasis, or distant metastasis (P > .05). There was low interobserver variability between two radiologists with concordance correlation coefficients of 0.90 for ln(MTV(WB)) and greater than 0.90 for SUV(maxWB), SUV(meanWB), and ln(TLG(WB)).
Conclusion: Baseline WB metabolic tumor burden, as measured with MTV and TLG, is a prognostic measurement in patients within Stage IV NSCLC with low interobserver variability. This study also suggests pretreatment MTV and TLG measurements may be used to further stratify patients with Stage IV NSCLC and are better prognostic measures than SUV(max) and SUV(mean) measurements.
Copyright © 2012 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.Acad Radiol. 2013 Jan;20(1):32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Sep 19. Acad Radiol. 2013. PMID: 22999369
-
Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Jan;39(1):27-38. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1934-6. Epub 2011 Sep 23. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012. PMID: 21946983
-
Prognostic significance of total lesion glycolysis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy.Eur J Radiol. 2012 Dec;81(12):4179-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Aug 9. Eur J Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22884163
-
Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Surgical Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.PLoS One. 2016 Jan 4;11(1):e0146195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146195. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26727114 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prognostic value of volumetric parameters of (18)F-FDG PET in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Feb;42(2):241-51. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2903-7. Epub 2014 Sep 6. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25193652
Cited by
-
Independent prognostic value of whole-body metabolic tumor burden from FDG-PET in non-small cell lung cancer.Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2013 Mar;8(2):181-91. doi: 10.1007/s11548-012-0749-7. Epub 2012 May 30. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2013. PMID: 22644386
-
Current Methods to Define Metabolic Tumor Volume in Positron Emission Tomography: Which One is Better?Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Feb;52(1):5-15. doi: 10.1007/s13139-017-0493-6. Epub 2017 Sep 19. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018. PMID: 29391907 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of early response to concomitant chemoradiotherapy by interim 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with locally advanced oesophageal carcinomas.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Apr;40(4):477-85. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2325-3. Epub 2013 Feb 1. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23371374
-
Correlation between combining 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters and other clinical features and ALK or ROS1 fusion in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 May;47(5):1183-1197. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04652-6. Epub 2020 Jan 3. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020. PMID: 31897590
-
Developing and validating a novel metabolic tumor volume risk stratification system for supplementing non-small cell lung cancer staging.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Nov;45(12):2079-2092. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4059-3. Epub 2018 Jun 7. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018. PMID: 29882161 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical