Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May;19(5):1670-7.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2152-y. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

Surveillance of pancreatic cancer patients after surgical resection

Affiliations

Surveillance of pancreatic cancer patients after surgical resection

Kristin M Sheffield et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 May.

Abstract

Background: There are no clear recommendations to guide posttreatment surveillance in patients with pancreatic cancer. Our goal was to describe the posttreatment surveillance patterns in patients undergoing curative-intent resection for pancreatic cancer.

Methods: We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked data (1992-2005) to identify CT scans and physician visits in patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent curative resection (n = 2393). Surveillance began 90 days after surgery, and patients were followed for 2 years at 6-month intervals. Patients were censored if they died, experienced recurrence of disease, or entered hospice.

Results: A total of 2045 patients survived uncensored to the beginning of the surveillance period. CT scan use decreased from 20.9% of patients in month 4 to 6.4% in month 27. There was no temporal pattern in CT use to suggest regular surveillance. Twenty-three percent of patients did not receive a CT scan in the year after surgery, increasing to 42% the second year. Patients who underwent adjuvant therapy and patients diagnosed in later years had higher CT scan use over the surveillance periods. Most patients visited both a primary care physician and a cancer specialist in each 6-month surveillance period. Patients who visited cancer specialists were more likely to have any CT scan and to be scanned more frequently.

Conclusions: Current surveillance patterns after resection for pancreatic cancer reflect the lack of established guidelines, implying a need for evaluation and standardization of surveillance protocols. The lack of a temporal pattern in CT testing suggests that most were obtained to evaluate symptoms rather than for routine surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1A-C
Figure 1A-C
Percentage of patients who received CT scan per month of follow-up among pancreatic cancer patients aged 66 years or older, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare 1992-2005: A) for the overall cohort; B) by receipt of adjuvant therapy; and C) by length of survival. Patients who died, entered hospice, or began noncurative therapy were censored at the date of event. N represents the number of patients who survived uncensored to the end of the month.

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277–300. - PubMed
    1. Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M, Seiler CA, Friess H, Buchler MW. Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2004 May;91(5):586–594. - PubMed
    1. Hattangadi JA, Hong TS, Yeap BY, Mamon HJ. Results and patterns of failure in patients treated with adjuvant combined chemoradiation therapy for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2009 Aug 15;115(16):3640–3650. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hernandez JM, Morton CA, Al-Saadi S, et al. The natural history of resected pancreatic cancer without adjuvant chemotherapy. Am Surg. 2010 May;76(5):480–485. - PubMed
    1. Asiyanbola B, Gleisner A, Herman JM, et al. Determining pattern of recurrence following pancreaticoduodenectomy and adjuvant 5-flurouracil-based chemoradiation therapy: effect of number of metastatic lymph nodes and lymph node ratio. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Apr;13(4):752–759. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms