Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov 30:2:358.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00358. eCollection 2011.

Commonalities between Perception and Cognition

Affiliations

Commonalities between Perception and Cognition

Michela C Tacca. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Perception and cognition are highly interrelated. Given the influence that these systems exert on one another, it is important to explain how perceptual representations and cognitive representations interact. In this paper, I analyze the similarities between visual perceptual representations and cognitive representations in terms of their structural properties and content. Specifically, I argue that the spatial structure underlying visual object representation displays systematicity - a property that is considered to be characteristic of propositional cognitive representations. To this end, I propose a logical characterization of visual feature binding as described by Treisman's Feature Integration Theory and argue that systematicity is not only a property of language-like representations, but also of spatially organized visual representations. Furthermore, I argue that if systematicity is taken to be a criterion to distinguish between conceptual and non-conceptual representations, then visual representations, that display systematicity, might count as an early type of conceptual representations. Showing these analogies between visual perception and cognition is an important step toward understanding the interface between the two systems. The ideas here presented might also set the stage for new empirical studies that directly compare binding (and other relational operations) in visual perception and higher cognition.

Keywords: attention; conceptual content; generality constraint; non-conceptual content; systematicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barrett H. C. (2005). Enzymatic computation and cognitive modularity. Mind Lang. 259–287
    1. Barsalou L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behav. Brain Sci. 577–660 - PubMed
    1. Bermúdez J. L. (2007). What is at stake in the debate on nonconceptual content? Philos. Perspect. 21, 55–7210.1111/j.1520-8583.2007.00120.x - DOI
    1. Bermúdez J. L., Cahen A. (2011). “Nonconceptual mental content,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2011 Edn, ed. Zalta E. N. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/content-nonconceptual/
    1. Blaser E., Pylyshyn Z. W., Holcombe A. O. (2000). Tracking an object through feature space. Nature 408, 196–19910.1038/35041567 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources