Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2011:809620.
doi: 10.1155/2011/809620. Epub 2011 Nov 16.

Number of natural teeth and oral impacts: a study on sri lankan adults

Affiliations

Number of natural teeth and oral impacts: a study on sri lankan adults

Roshnal Perera et al. Int J Dent. 2011.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the association between the number of natural teeth and oral impacts in Sri Lankan adults. The sample consisted of 476, 40-59 and 452, ≥60 year olds. Oral impacts were assessed using a validated Sinhalese translation of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 scale. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to determine the number of natural teeth that would best discriminate those with oral impacts from those without. Oral impacts were reported by 26% of the 40-59 year olds and 34% of the older individuals. In both groups there was a significant negative correlation between the number of teeth present and oral impacts. The ROC curve for the 40-59 year olds gave an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.758 (95% CI = 0.702-0.814; P < 0.001) with an optimal cut-off of 24/25 teeth while for the ≥60 year olds, the AUC of the ROC curve was 0.737 (95% CI = 0.684-0.790; P < 0.001) with an optimal cut-off of 18/19 teeth. Based on the ROC curves the optimal cutoffs of the number of natural teeth that best discriminated between those with and without oral impacts for 40-59 and ≥60 year olds were 24-25 and 18-19, respectively.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC curve for number of natural teeth discriminating those with/without oral impacts in 40–59 year olds. AUC = 0.758 (95% CI = 0.702–0.814); P < 0.001. Optimal cutoff based on curve = 24/25 teeth.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curve for number of natural teeth discriminating those with/without oral impacts in ≥60 year olds. AUC = 0.737 (95% CI = 0.684–0.790); P < 0.001. Optimal cutoff based on curve = 18/19 teeth.

Similar articles

References

    1. Tsakos G, Marcenes W, Sheiham A. The relationship between clinical dental status and oral impacts in an elderly population. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2004;2(3):211–220. - PubMed
    1. Zeng X, Sheiham A, Bernabé E, Tsakos G. Relationship between dental status and Oral Impacts on Daily Performances in older Southern Chinese people. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 2010;70(2):101–107. - PubMed
    1. Federation Dentaire Internationale/World Health Organization. Global goals for oral health in the year 2000. International Dental Journal. 1982;32(1):74–77. - PubMed
    1. Gotfredsen K, Walls AWG. What dentition assures oral function? Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2007;18(supplement 3):34–45. - PubMed
    1. Steele JG, Sanders AE, Slade GD, et al. How do age and tooth loss affect oral health impacts and quality of life? A study comparing two national samples. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2004;32(2):107–114. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources