Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Sep;83(9):1104-9.
doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110456. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

The effect of internal versus external abutment connection modes on crestal bone changes around dental implants: a radiographic analysis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The effect of internal versus external abutment connection modes on crestal bone changes around dental implants: a radiographic analysis

Ki-Tae Koo et al. J Periodontol. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Background: To the best of our knowledge, the influence of external versus internal implant-abutment connections on crestal bone remodeling has not been reported. The aim of the present study is to investigate the influence of the abutment connection on peri-implant crestal bone levels (CBLs) using radiographic recordings.

Methods: Radiographic recordings from 40 single-tooth implants (20 external and 20 internal octagonal connections; one implant/patient) in 40 patients (15 males and 25 females; mean age: 54.3 years) were selected for analyses. The radiographic evaluation included the following: 1) linear bone change (LBC); 2) dimensional change (DC); and 3) angle between the implant and adjacent bone (AIB). Differences in LBC, DC, and AIB between implant placement and 1 year after loading for each system were evaluated using a paired t test. Comparison of LBC, DC, and AIB between systems at 1 year after loading was done using analysis of covariance. The significance level was set at P ≤0.05.

Results: Radiographic CBLs (LBCs) were reduced at 1 year after loading compared to those at implant placement to reach statistical significance for the external connection (P = 0.000) but not the internal connection (P = 0.939). CBL changes were significantly greater for the external compared to the internal connection (P = 0.000). Similarly, the DC for the external connection was significantly greater compared to that for the internal connection (P = 0.004).

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, the implant-abutment connection technology appears to have a significant impact on peri-implant CBLs, with the external connection paralleled by a significant reduction of CBLs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources