Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec 7:11:54.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-54.

Validation of a susceptibility, benefits, and barrier scale for mammography screening among Peruvian women: a cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Validation of a susceptibility, benefits, and barrier scale for mammography screening among Peruvian women: a cross-sectional study

Moises A Huaman et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

Background: Perceived beliefs about breast cancer and breast cancer screening are important predictors for mammography utilization. This study adapted and validated the Champion's scale in Peru. This scale measures perceived susceptibility for breast cancer and perceived benefits and barriers for mammography.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among women ages 40 to 65 attending outpatient gynecology services in a public hospital in Peru. A group of experts developed and pre-tested a Spanish version of the Champion's scale to assess its comprehensibility (N=20). Factor analysis, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability analyses were performed (N=285). Concurrent validity compared scores from participants who had a mammogram and those who did not have it in the previous 15 months. T-test and multiple regression analysis adjusting for socio-demographic factors, mammography knowledge and other preventive behaviors were performed.

Results: The construct validity and reliability were optimal. Cronbach-Alpha coefficients were 0.75 (susceptibility), 0.72 (benefits) and 0.86 (barriers). Concurrent validity analysis showed an association between barriers and mammography screening use in bivariate (22.3±6.7 vs. 30.2±7.6; p<0.001) and multiple regression analysis (OR=0.28, 95% CI=0.18-0.43). Ages 50-60 years (OR=2.35, 95% CI=1.19-4.65), history of prior Papanicolaou test (OR=3.69, 95% CI=1.84-7.40), and knowledge about breast cancer and mammography (OR=3.69, 95% CI=1.84-7.40) were also independently associated with mammography screening use.

Conclusion: Concurrent validity analysis showed that the Champion's scale has important limitations for assessing perceived susceptibility for breast cancer and perceived benefits for mammography among Peruvian women. There is still a need for developing valid and reliable instruments for measuring perceived beliefs about breast cancer and mammography screening among Peruvian women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kesteloot HE, Zhang J. Differences in breast cancer mortality worldwide: unsolved problems. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2006;15(5):416–423. doi: 10.1097/00008469-200610000-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lima, Peru: Centro de Investigación en Cáncer «Maes-Heller». Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas; 1998. Registro de Cáncer de Lima Metropolitana 1990 - 1993.
    1. Lima, Peru: Centro de Investigación en Cáncer «Maes-Heller». Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas; 2004. Registro de Cáncer de Lima Metropolitana 1994 - 1997.
    1. Plan Nacional para el Fortalecimiento de la Prevención y Control del Cáncer en el Perú M N030-2007. Lima, Peru: Ministerio de Salud; 2007.
    1. Nystrom L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjold B, Rutqvist LE. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet. 2002;359(9310):909–919. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08020-0. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms