Comment
doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.615889.
A case study in junk bioethics run amok
Affiliations
- PMID: 22146037
- DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2011.615889
Item in Clipboard
Comment
A case study in junk bioethics run amok
Am J Bioeth.
2011 Dec.
No abstract available
Comment on
-
Obstetricians and violence against women.Am J Bioeth. 2011 Dec;11(12):51-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.623813. Am J Bioeth. 2011. PMID: 22146035
Similar articles
-
Meeting the doctor with my clothes on.Am J Bioeth. 2011 Dec;11(12):69-70. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.615885. Am J Bioeth. 2011. PMID: 22146042 No abstract available.
-
Withholding or necessary filtering of information?Am J Bioeth. 2011 Dec;11(12):70-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.623814. Am J Bioeth. 2011. PMID: 22146043 No abstract available.
-
Polemics and pregnancy: a response to arguments about ethical obstetrical care.Am J Bioeth. 2011 Dec;11(12):64-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.613523. Am J Bioeth. 2011. PMID: 22146039 No abstract available.
-
Medical futility and implications for physician autonomy.Am J Law Med. 1995;21(2-3):221-40. Am J Law Med. 1995. PMID: 8571976 Review. No abstract available.
-
An Orwellian scenario: court ordered caesarean section and women's autonomy.Nurs Ethics. 1999 Nov;6(6):494-505. doi: 10.1177/096973309900600605. Nurs Ethics. 1999. PMID: 10696195 Review.
Cited by
-
Biases in bioethics: a narrative review.BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Mar 6;24(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00894-0. BMC Med Ethics. 2023. PMID: 36879251 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical