Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec 6;13(4):e113.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.1899.

Ethical principles for physician rating sites

Affiliations

Ethical principles for physician rating sites

Daniel Strech. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

During the last 5 years, an ethical debate has emerged, often in public media, about the potential positive and negative effects of physician rating sites and whether physician rating sites created by insurance companies or government agencies are ethical in their current states. Due to the lack of direct evidence of physician rating sites' effects on physicians' performance, patient outcomes, or the public's trust in health care, most contributions refer to normative arguments, hypothetical effects, or indirect evidence. This paper aims, first, to structure the ethical debate about the basic concept of physician rating sites: allowing patients to rate, comment, and discuss physicians' performance, online and visible to everyone. Thus, it provides a more thorough and transparent starting point for further discussion and decision making on physician rating sites: what should physicians and health policy decision makers take into account when discussing the basic concept of physician rating sites and its possible implications on the physician-patient relationship? Second, it discusses where and how the preexisting evidence from the partly related field of public reporting of physician performance can serve as an indicator for specific needs of evaluative research in the field of physician rating sites. This paper defines the ethical principles of patient welfare, patient autonomy, physician welfare, and social justice in the context of physician rating sites. It also outlines basic conditions for a fair decision-making process concerning the implementation and regulation of physician rating sites, namely, transparency, justification, participation, minimization of conflicts of interest, and openness for revision. Besides other issues described in this paper, one trade-off presents a special challenge and will play an important role when deciding about more- or less-restrictive physician rating sites regulations: the potential psychological and financial harms for physicians that can result from physician rating sites need to be contained without limiting the potential benefits for patients with respect to health, health literacy, and equity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lagu T, Hannon NS, Rothberg MB, Lindenauer PK. Patients' evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking: an analysis of physician-rating websites. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Sep;25(9):942–6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1383-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reimann S, Strech D. The representation of patient experience and satisfaction in physician rating sites. A criteria-based analysis of English- and German-language sites. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:332. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-332. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/3321472-6963-10-332 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lagu T, Lindenauer PK. Putting the public back in public reporting of health care quality. JAMA. 2010 Oct 20;304(15):1711–2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1499.304/15/1711 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kadry B, Chu LF, Kadry B, Gammas D, Macario A. Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e95. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1960. http://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e95/v13i4e95 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schaefer C, Schwarz S. [Doctor rating sites: which of them find the best doctors in Germany?] Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2010;104(7):572–7. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.09.002.S1865-9217(10)00243-6 - DOI - PubMed