Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Jan;158(1):2-22.
doi: 10.1104/pp.111.189845. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

Natural variation in Arabidopsis: from molecular genetics to ecological genomics

Detlef Weigel  1
Affiliations
Review

Natural variation in Arabidopsis: from molecular genetics to ecological genomics

Detlef Weigel. Plant Physiol. 2012 Jan.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Gross morphological variation in Arabidopsis and relatives. A, Variation between Arabidopsis accessions. On top, vegetative rosettes of accessions grown for 4 weeks in long days are shown. They vary in rosette diameter and compactness, leaf shape, and tissue necrosis or onset of senescence. Similarly, variation in size and shape of individual leaves, in this case the sixth in the rosette, is apparent in the 10 examples shown on the bottom left. Finally, differences in overall architecture are illustrated with five plants. On the left is an early flowering accession with few rosette leaves. The next two flower later, but the second one from the left has reduced apical dominance. Finally, the two accessions on the right have similarly tall main inflorescences but differ in the number of secondary inflorescences. The appearance on the far right is common among wild-grown plants. B, Some characters, such as flower size and fruit shape, vary relatively little within Arabidopsis, but more dramatic variation is found in comparison with closely related taxa, such as Capsella rubella (left) and A. lyrata (right). Images courtesy of Eunyoung Chae, Sang-Tae Kim, and George Wang.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Populations for mapping genes causing trait variation. Colors indicate contribution from different parental accessions. Only one chromosome pair is shown for each individual. HIF individuals are derived from RILs, in which a small portion of the genome is still heterozygous.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Distribution of over 7,000 Arabidopsis accessions collected from the wild and available in the stock center or soon-to-be-released collections. Western and southern Europe, including Great Britain, is heavily overrepresented, although sampling is not even. Accessions from the presumed native range are in yellow and likely introductions in red. Whether the distribution across China to Japan is continuous with the native range is unclear. Arabidopsis has been reported in additional locales, such as South Korea, and several African countries (Alonso-Blanco and Koornneef, 2000). Maps courtesy of George Wang.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Quantitative complementation and knockdown to determine whether QTL are allelic to a candidate gene. Both tests rely on quantitative comparisons between genotypes; the dashed boxes indicate phenotypic differences to the genotype to the left. In a quantitative complementation test, one determines whether the two QTL alleles, Q1 and Q2, are differentially affected when heterozygous with the wild-type (wt) or mutant (mut) allele of a candidate gene (Mackay, 2001). If the QTL alleles respond differently, i.e. if in this example only Q1 complements the mutant phenotype, the candidate gene and the QTL are probably allelic. Similarly, in a quantitative knockdown experiment, a differential effect of an amiRNA (amiR) against the candidate gene indicates that the Q1 allele has lower activity than Q2 and that the candidate gene is likely responsible for the QTL.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Comparison of expected and observed occurrences of 8,133 independent premature stops in 4,263 protein coding genes, considering all genes with >90% coverage in 75 out of 80 accessions. Data are from Cao et al. (2011).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Relationship between approaches to the study of genetic variation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Founders review 2012.
    Ort DR, Grennan AK. Ort DR, et al. Plant Physiol. 2012 Jan;158(1):1. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.900428. Plant Physiol. 2012. PMID: 22213247 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Adams S, Allen T, Whitelam GC. (2009) Interaction between the light quality and flowering time pathways in Arabidopsis. Plant J 60: 257–267 - PubMed
    1. Alcázar R, García AV, Kronholm I, de Meaux J, Koornneef M, Parker JE, Reymond M. (2010) Natural variation at Strubbelig Receptor Kinase 3 drives immune-triggered incompatibilities between Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. Nat Genet 42: 1135–1139 - PubMed
    1. Alcázar R, García AV, Parker JE, Reymond M. (2009) Incremental steps toward incompatibility revealed by Arabidopsis epistatic interactions modulating salicylic acid pathway activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 334–339 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alonso JM, Ecker JR. (2006) Moving forward in reverse: genetic technologies to enable genome-wide phenomic screens in Arabidopsis. Nat Rev Genet 7: 524–536 - PubMed
    1. Alonso-Blanco C, El-Assal SE, Coupland G, Koornneef M. (1998a) Analysis of natural allelic variation at flowering time loci in the Landsberg erecta and Cape Verde Islands ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 149: 749–764 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources