Differences in the form of the salt-transformed estrogen receptor when bound by estrogen versus antiestrogen
- PMID: 2214766
- DOI: 10.1016/0022-4731(90)90166-p
Differences in the form of the salt-transformed estrogen receptor when bound by estrogen versus antiestrogen
Abstract
Our laboratory has previously reported that antiestrogen binding to molybdate-stabilized non-transformed estrogen receptor results in a larger form of the receptor in 0.3 M KCl when compared with estrogen bound receptor. Estradiol promoted the formation of monomers in the presence of 0.3 M KCl whereas antiestrogen appeared to promote dimer formation. We have extended these studies examining the rabbit uterine salt-transformed estrogen receptor partially purified by DEAE-cellulose chromatography. We previously demonstrated that estrogen receptor prepared in this way bound to different sites on partially deproteinized chromatin subfractions or reconstituted chromosomal protein/DNA fractions when the receptor was complexed with estrogen vs antiestrogen. Analysis of these receptor preparations indicated that DEAE-cellulose step-elution resulted in a peak fraction which sedimented as a single 5.9S peak in 5-20% sucrose density gradients containing 0.3 M KCl for receptor bound by the antiestrogens H1285 and trans-hydroxytamoxifen. However, receptor bound by estradiol sedimented as 4.5S. These receptor complexes bound DNA-cellulose indicating that these partially purified receptors were transformed. DEAE rechromatography or agarose gel filtration of the partially purified antiestrogen-receptor complexes resulted in significant dissociation of the larger complex into monomers. Incubations of 5.9S antiestrogen-receptor complexes with antibodies against nontransformed steroid receptor-associated proteins (the 59 and 90 kDa proteins) did not result in the interaction of this larger antiestrogen-receptor complex with these antibodies (obtained from L. E. Faber and D. O. Toft, respectively). Our results support the concept that antiestrogen binding induces a different receptor conformation which could affect monomer-dimer equilibrium, thus rendering the antiestrogen-receptor complex incapable of inducing complete estrogenic responses in target tissues.
Similar articles
-
Estrogen and antiestrogen binding to rat uterine and pituitary estrogen receptor: evidence for at least two physicochemical forms of the estrogen receptor.J Steroid Biochem. 1985 Nov;23(5A):537-45. doi: 10.1016/0022-4731(85)90001-9. J Steroid Biochem. 1985. PMID: 4079371
-
Effects of antiestrogen versus antiprogestin on transformed and nontransformed steroid receptors.J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1991 Feb;38(2):197-203. doi: 10.1016/0960-0760(91)90126-p. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1991. PMID: 2004041
-
Interaction of the antiestrogen [3H]H1285 with the two forms of the molybdate-stabilized calf uterine estrogen receptor.J Steroid Biochem. 1984 Dec;21(6):625-31. doi: 10.1016/0022-4731(84)90022-0. J Steroid Biochem. 1984. PMID: 6527530
-
Nuclear acceptor sites for steroid hormone receptors: comparisons of steroids and antisteroids.J Steroid Biochem. 1988 Oct;31(4B):579-92. doi: 10.1016/0022-4731(88)90009-x. J Steroid Biochem. 1988. PMID: 3059057 Review.
-
The agonistic and antagonistic properties of the high affinity antiestrogen--H1285.Pharmacol Ther. 1983;21(2):247-64. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(83)90075-x. Pharmacol Ther. 1983. PMID: 6312469 Review. No abstract available.