Similar articles

• Access site selection for primary PCI: the evidence for transradial access is strong.

  Ratib K, Mamas MA, Routledge H, Fraser D, Nolan J. Ratib K, et al. Heart. 2012 Sep;98(18):1392; author reply 1392-3. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-301935. Epub 2012 Jul 3. Heart. 2012. PMID: 22760865 No abstract available.
• Influence of access site selection on PCI-related adverse events in patients with STEMI: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

  Mamas MA, Ratib K, Routledge H, Fath-Ordoubadi F, Neyses L, Louvard Y, Fraser DG, Nolan J. Mamas MA, et al. Heart. 2012 Feb;98(4):303-11. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300558. Epub 2011 Dec 6. Heart. 2012. PMID: 22147900 Review.
• Reperfusion Times for Radial Versus Femoral Access in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Observations From the Cardiac Care Network Provincial Primary PCI Registry.

  Cantor WJ, Ko DT, Natarajan MK, Džavík V, Wijeysundera HC, Wang JT, Kingsbury KJ, Velianou JL, Cohen EA, Le May MR, Tu JV. Cantor WJ, et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;8(5):e002097. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002097. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015. PMID: 25910502
• Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

  Karrowni W, Vyas A, Giacomino B, Schweizer M, Blevins A, Girotra S, Horwitz PA. Karrowni W, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):814-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.010. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013. PMID: 23968700 Review.
• Primary angioplasty in the ACCEPT registry: Why has it been difficult to accept and implement the radial artery access as preferential?

  Siqueira DA, Brito FS Jr, Abizaid AA. Siqueira DA, et al. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014 Oct;103(4):268-71. doi: 10.5935/abc.20140154. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 25352502 Free PMC article. No abstract available.