Prognostic value of immunohistochemical biomarkers at different cut-off values in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP chemotherapy
- PMID: 22147991
- PMCID: PMC3230014
- DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.12.1556
Prognostic value of immunohistochemical biomarkers at different cut-off values in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP chemotherapy
Abstract
Many predictive models have been proposed for better stratification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Hans' algorithm has been widely used as standard to sub-classify DLBCL into germinal center B-cell (GCB) and non-GCB origins. However, there have been disagreements in the literature regarding its prognostic significance. Here, we retrospectively analyzed Hans' algorithm and the individual immunohistochemical biomarkers at different cut-off values (5%, 30%, 50% or 75%) in 94 Korean patients with DLBCL treated with combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, daunorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone. No significant differences were observed between the GCB (18 patients, 19.1%) and non-GCB (76, 80.9%) groups. Among individual biomarkers, CD10 negativity (cut point: 30%) and bcl-6 positivity (cut point: 5%) were independent good prognostic markers in progression-free survival (PFS), whereas bcl-6 (cut point: 5%) positivity was an independent good prognostic marker in overall survival irrelevant of international prognostic index. The present study showed the lack of predictability of Hans' algorithm in DLBCL patients, and that CD10, Bcl-6 may have diverse prognostic significance at different cut-off values. Our results suggest that the proposed cut-off value may not be applied universally, and that the optimal cut-off value may need to be optimized for individual laboratory.
Keywords: Bcl-6; CD10; CHOP Chemotherapy; Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL); Germinal Center B-cell (GCB); Hans' Algorithm; Non-germinal Center B-cell (Non-GCB).
Figures
References
-
- The Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Classification Project. A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Blood. 1997;89:3909–3918. - PubMed
-
- Anderson JR, Armitage JO, Weisenburger DD. Epidemiology of the non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: distributions of the major subtypes differ by geographic locations. The Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Classification Project. Ann Oncol. 1998;9:717–720. - PubMed
-
- Colomo L, López-Guillermo A, Perales M, Rives S, Martinez A, Bosch F, Colomer D, Falini B, Montserrat E, Campo E. Clinical impact of the differentiation profile assessed by immunophenotyping in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2003;101:78–84. - PubMed
-
- The International Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Poject. A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:987–994. - PubMed
-
- Barrans SL, Carter I, Owen RG, Davies FE, Patmore RD, Haynes AP, Morgan GJ, Jack AS. Germinal center phenotype and bcl-2 expression combined with the International Prognostic Index improves patient risk stratification in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2002;99:1136–1143. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
