Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;38(12):6571-84.
doi: 10.1118/1.3660328.

Effects of motion, attenuation, and scatter corrections on gated cardiac SPECT reconstruction

Affiliations

Effects of motion, attenuation, and scatter corrections on gated cardiac SPECT reconstruction

Xiaofeng Niu et al. Med Phys. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: In gated cardiac single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), image reconstruction is often hampered by various degrading factors including depth-dependent spatial blurring, attenuation, scatter, motion blurring, and low data counts. Consequently, there has been significant development in image reconstruction methods for improving the quality of reconstructed images. The goal of this work is to investigate how these degrading factors will impact the reconstructed myocardium when different reconstruction methods are used.

Methods: The authors conduct a comparative study of the effects of these degrading factors on the accuracy of myocardium by several reconstruction algorithms, including (1) a clinical spatiotemporal processing method, (2) maximum likelihood (ML) estimation, (3) 3D maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation, (4) 3D MAP with posttemporal filtering, and (5) motion-compensated spatiotemporal (4D) reconstruction. To quantify the reconstruction results, the authors use the following measures on different aspects of the myocardium: (1) overall error level in the myocardium, (2) regional accuracy of the left ventricle (LV) wall, (3) uniformity of the LV, (4) accuracy of regional time activity curves by normalized cross-correlation coefficient, and (5) perfusion defect detectability. The authors also assess the effectiveness of degrading corrections in reconstruction by considering an upper bound for each reconstruction method, which represents what would be achieved by each method if the acquired data were free from attenuation and scatter degradations. In the experiments the authors use Monte Carlo simulated cardiac gated SPECT imaging based on the 4D NURBS-based cardiac-torso (NCAT) phantom with different patient geometry and lesion settings, in which the simulated ground truth is known for the purpose of quantitative evaluation.

Results: The results demonstrate that use of temporal processing in reconstruction (Methods 1, 4, and 5 above) can greatly improve the reconstructed myocardium in terms of both error level and perfusion defect detection. In low-count gated studies, it can have even greater impact than other degrading factors. Both attenuation and scatter corrections can lead to reduced error levels in the myocardium in all methods; in particular, with 4D the bias can be reduced by as much as four-fold compared to no correction. There is a slight increase in noise level observed with scatter correction. A significant improvement in heart wall appearance is demonstrated in reconstruction results from three sets of clinical acquisitions as correction for degradations is combined with refinement of temporal filtering.

Conclusions: Correction for degrading factors such as resolution, attenuation, scatter, and motion blur can all lead to improved image quality in cardiac gated SPECT reconstruction. However, their effectiveness could also vary with the reconstruction algorithms used. Both attenuation and scatter corrections can effectively reduce the bias level of the reconstructed LV wall, though scatter correction is also observed to increase the variance level. Use of temporal processing in reconstruction can have greater impact on the accuracy of the myocardium than correction of other degrading factors. Overall, use of degrading corrections in 4D reconstruction is shown to be most effective for improving both reconstruction accuracy of the myocardium and detectability of perfusion defects in gated images.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Transverse slices of male and female phantoms (Phantoms A and B, respectively).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Regions of interest (ROIs) defined in the two phantoms for bias-variance, CHO, TAC and uniformity analyses. These are from original source distributions without any degradations; (a) and (b) are shown in transverse slices, and (c) and (d) are in short-axis slices. Note that (a) and (b) are shown with interpolation for CHO.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean square error (MSE) of reconstructed myocardium with different reconstruction and degrading correction methods for Phantom A: (a) ML and 3D MAP reconstruction (MAP-S), (b) 3D MAP with post-temporal filtering (MAP-S + T121), (c) 4D. Note that a smaller MSE value indicates a better agreement with the reference.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Bias-standard deviation plots of a normal ROI obtained with different reconstruction and degrading correction methods: (a) Phantom A with ML and 3D MAP reconstruction (MAP-S), (b) Phantom B with ML and MAP-S, (c) Phantom A with 3D MAP with post-temporal filtering (MAP-S + T121), (d) Phantom B with MAP-S + T121, (e) Phantom A with 4D, and (f) Phantom B with 4D. Note that the lower left corner in these curves corresponds to the lowest noise level and bias.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Uniformity measure of the LV wall obtained with different reconstruction and degrading correction methods with Phantom A.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Normalized cross-correlation coefficients of reconstructed TACs obtained with different reconstruction and degrading correction methods with Phantom A.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Channelized Hotelling observer performance obtained with different reconstruction and degrading correction methods: (a) Phantom A with ML and 3D MAP reconstruction (MAP-S), (b) Phantom B with ML and MAP-S, (c) Phantom A with 3D MAP with post-temporal filtering (MAP-S + T121), (d) Phantom B with MAP-S + T121, (e) Phantom A with 4D, and (f) Phantom B with 4D. Note that a larger Az value indicates better detection accuracy.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Reconstructed images of myocardium (Phantom B) in short-axis at end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES) by different methods.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Reconstructed images of myocardium in short-axis at end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES) from three Tc-99m Mibi SPECT patient studies.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. King M. A. and Miller T. R., “Use of nonstationary temporal Wiener filter in nuclear medicine,” Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 10, pp. 458–461 (1985).10.1007/BF00256591 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lalush D. S. and Tsui B. M. W., “Block-iterative techniques for fast 4D reconstruction using a prior motion models in gated cardiac SPECT,” Phys. Med. Biol 43, pp. 875–886 (1998).10.1088/0031-9155/43/4/015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gilland D. R., Mair B. A., Bowsher J. E., and Jaszczak R. J., “Simultaneous reconstruction and motion estimation for gated cardiac ECT,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 49, pp. 2344–2349 (2002).10.1109/TNS.2002.803820 - DOI
    1. Brankov J. G., Yang Y., and Wernick M. N., “Spatio-temporal processing of gated cardiac SPECT images using deformable mesh modeling,” Med. Phys. 32(9), pp. 2839–2849 (2005).10.1118/1.2013027 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jin M., Yang Y., Niu X., Marin T., Brankov J. G., Feng B., Pretorius P. H., King M. A., and Wernick M. N., “A quantitative evaluation study of four-dimensional gated cardiac SPECT reconstruction,” Phys. Med. Biol. 54, pp. 5643–5659 (2009).10.1088/0031-9155/54/18/019 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms