Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;70(5):390-7.
doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.629627. Epub 2011 Dec 8.

Caregivers' oral health literacy and their young children's oral health-related quality-of-life

Affiliations

Caregivers' oral health literacy and their young children's oral health-related quality-of-life

Kimon Divaris et al. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the association of caregivers' oral health literacy (OHL) with their children's oral health related-quality of life (C-OHRQoL) and explore literacy as a modifier in the association between children's oral health status (COHS) and C-OHRQoL.

Methods: This study relied upon data from structured interviews with 203 caregivers of children aged 3-5 from the Carolina Oral Health Literacy (COHL) Project. Data were collected for OHL using REALD-30, caregiver-reported COHS using the NHANES-item and C-OHRQoL using the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS). This study also measured oral health behaviors (OHBs) and socio-demographic characteristics and calculated overall/stratified summary estimates for OHL and C-OHRQoL. Spearman's rho and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed as measures of correlation of OHL and COHS with C-OHRQoL. To determine whether OHL modified the association between COHS and C-OHRQoL, this study compared literacy-specific summary and regression estimates.

Results: Reported COHS was: excellent-50%, very good-28%, good-14%, fair-6%, poor-2%. The aggregate C-OHRQoL mean score was 2.0 (95% CI: 1.4, 2.6), and the mean OHL score 15.9 (95% CI: 15.2, 16.7). There was an inverse relationship between COHS and C-OHRQoL: ρ = -0.32 (95% CI: -0.45, -0.18). There was no important association between OHL and C-OHRQoL; however, deleterious OHBs were associated with worse C-OHRQoL. Literacy-specific linear and Poisson regression estimates of the association between COHS and C-OHRQoL departed from homogeneity (Wald χ(2) p < 0.2).

Conclusion: In this community-based sample of caregiver/child dyads, a strong correlation was found between OHS and C-OHRQoL. The association's magnitude and gradient were less pronounced among caregivers with low literacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Bar graphs illustrating the mean child oral health related quality of life scores (ECOHIS) by caregiver-reported child oral health status, for strata of caregiver oral health literacy (OHL; “low” literacy: <13 REALD-30; “high” literacy: ≥13 REALD-30) among the 203 caregiver-child dyads participating in the Carolina Oral Health Literacy (COHL) project.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) [April 12 2011];Definition of dental disability. 2008 Available at: http://www.aapd.org/media/Policies_Guidelines/D_DentalDisability.pdf.
    1. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) [April 12 2011];Policy on early childhood caries (ECC): Classification, consequences, and preventive strategies. 2008 Available at: http://www.aapd.org/media/Policies_Guidelines/P_ECCClassifications.pdf. - PubMed
    1. Hale KJ, American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Pediatric Dentistry Oral health risk assessment timing and establishment of the dental home. Pediatrics. 2003;111(5 Pt 1):1113–6. - PubMed
    1. Mouradian WE. The face of a child: children's oral health and dental education. J Dent Educ. 2001;65:821–31. - PubMed
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services . In: Oral Health in America: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville Md., editor. Vol. 7. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2000. pp. 158–68.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances