Comparison of size 2 i-gel supraglottic airway with LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Classic™ in spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective surgery
- PMID: 22151106
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03757.x
Comparison of size 2 i-gel supraglottic airway with LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Classic™ in spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective surgery
Abstract
Background: We compared size 2 i-gel(®) (Intersurgical Inc.), a relatively new supraglottic airway device for use in spontaneously breathing anesthesized children with two different types of laryngeal mask airway-ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) and Classic™ laryngeal mask airway (cLMA) for the ease of insertion, oropharyngeal sealing pressures (OSPs), and air leak. The hemodynamic effects on insertion of device and postoperative adverse effects were also noted.
Methods: A randomized prospective study was planned in 120 children aged 2-5 years, weighing 10-20 kg, ASA physical status I-II scheduled for routine elective surgeries of <1-h duration. They were randomly divided in three groups (i-gel, PLMA, and cLMA) of 40 each, and a standard protocol for anesthesia was followed.
Results: The age, weight, height, and type of surgery were similar in all groups. Success rate for first attempt was 95% for the i-gel group and 90% for the two laryngeal mask airway groups. Insertion was found to be easy in the majority of cases in all groups, and there was no change in blood pressure, heart rate, or oxygen saturation on insertion. The OSP was 26 ± 2.6, 23 ± 1.2, and 22 ± 2.3 cm H(2)O for i-gel, PLMA, and cLMA, respectively. The difference between the i-gel and both laryngeal mask airway groups was statistically significant (P < 0.01). There were no clinically important complications in the postoperative period.
Conclusion: Pediatric size 2 i-gel is easy to insert and provides higher OSP compared with same size PLMA and cLMA in spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective surgery. It may be a safe alternative to laryngeal mask airways in day care surgeries.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Similar articles
-
The Size 1 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, noncrossover study with the Classic™ laryngeal mask airway.Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Apr;22(4):365-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03801.x. Epub 2012 Feb 1. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012. PMID: 22295870 Clinical Trial.
-
The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jul;27(7):598-601. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283340a81. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010. PMID: 19915475 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized crossover comparison between the Laryngeal Mask Airway-Unique™ and the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway in children.Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Feb;22(2):161-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03703.x. Epub 2011 Sep 15. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012. PMID: 21917058 Clinical Trial.
-
Brief review: The LMA Supreme™ supraglottic airway.Can J Anaesth. 2012 May;59(5):483-93. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9673-0. Epub 2012 Feb 9. Can J Anaesth. 2012. PMID: 22318376 Review.
-
Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis.J Clin Anesth. 2016 Sep;33:298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 May 18. J Clin Anesth. 2016. PMID: 27555181 Review.
Cited by
-
Ambu AuraOnce versus i-gel laryngeal mask airway in infants and children undergoing surgical procedures. A randomized controlled trial.Saudi Med J. 2017 May;38(5):482-490. doi: 10.15537/smj.2017.5.17960. Saudi Med J. 2017. PMID: 28439597 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of size 1 I-gel compared with size 1 ProSeal laryngeal mask in anesthetized infants and neonates.ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:426186. doi: 10.1155/2015/426186. Epub 2015 Feb 22. ScientificWorldJournal. 2015. PMID: 25793219 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A study of effect of lateral position on oropharyngeal seal pressure of i-gel® and ProSeal™ LMA in children.Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Feb;64(2):125-130. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_635_19. Epub 2020 Feb 4. Indian J Anaesth. 2020. PMID: 32139930 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison of i-gel™ and LMA Supreme™ in anesthetized and paralyzed children.Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 Nov;67(5):317-22. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2014.67.5.317. Epub 2014 Nov 26. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014. PMID: 25473460 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of i-gel™ supraglottic device with classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed children undergoing elective surgery.Anesth Essays Res. 2012 Jul-Dec;6(2):180-3. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.108305. Anesth Essays Res. 2012. PMID: 25885613 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical