A study of physician recommendations for reversible contraceptive methods using standardized patients
- PMID: 22151509
- PMCID: PMC3537260
- DOI: 10.1363/4322411
A study of physician recommendations for reversible contraceptive methods using standardized patients
Abstract
Context: Health care providers may influence patients' choice of contraceptive method, yet little is known about the recommendations they make to their patients.
Methods: In 2007-2008, a total of 468 physicians at four family medicine and obstetrics and gynecology meetings were randomly assigned to view one of 18 videos of a patient seeking contraceptive advice; the patients were standardized for most relevant behaviors and characteristics, but differed by race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status and gynecologic history. Participants provided their demographic and practice characteristics and completed a survey about their contraceptive recommendations for the patient. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify associations between physician characteristics and recommendations for specific contraceptive methods.
Results: The most frequently recommended methods were the pill (89%) and ring (80%), followed by the levonor-gestrel IUD (64%), patch (56%), injectable (49%) and copper IUD (45%). Oral contraceptives were more likely to be recommended by private practice physicians than by academic physicians (odds ratio, 2.9). Recommendations for the ring were less common among family physicians and those 56 or older than among obstetrician-gynecologists and those 35 or younger (0.6 and 0.3, respectively), and more common among physicians in private practice than among those in academia (2.4). The patch and injectable were more commonly recommended by family physicians than by obstetrician-gynecologists (2.6 and 2.5, respectively). Both IUD types were recommended less often by physicians 36 or older than by younger ones (0.2-0.5).
Discussion: The advice women receive about contraception may vary according to the characteristics of their provider. Research on the reasons for these differences is needed.
Copyright © 2011 by the Guttmacher Institute.
References
-
- Russell ML, Love EJ. Contraceptive prescription: physician beliefs, attitudes and socio-demographic characteristics. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 1991;82(4):259–263. - PubMed
-
- Harper CC, et al. Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2008;111(6):1359–1369. - PubMed
-
- Landry DJ, Wei J, Frost JJ. Public and private providers’ involvement in improving their patients’ contraceptive use. Contraception. 2008;78(1):42–51. - PubMed
-
- Schreiber CA, et al. Training and attitudes about contraceptive management across primary care specialties: a survey of graduating residents. Contraception. 2006;73(6):618–622. - PubMed
-
- Stanwood NL, Garrett JM, Konrad TR. Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2002;99(2):275–280. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
