Sensory recovery following digital replantation
- PMID: 2215195
- DOI: 10.1002/micr.1920110311
Sensory recovery following digital replantation
Abstract
The recovery of sensibility following digital replantation is essential in the restoration of hand function. We reviewed 12 series of digital replantations between 1977 and 1989. Three hundred sixty-seven fingers and 87 thumbs were successfully replanted. Mean age was 32.5 years. Mean follow-up was 33.5 months. Mean static two-point discrimination (S2PD) was 9.3 mm in clean thumbs vs. 12.1 mm in crush/avulsion thumb replantations. Mean S2PD was 8 mm in clean finger vs. 15 mm in crush/avulsion finger replantations. Overall mean S2PD was 11 mm in thumb and 12 mm in finger replantations. Sixty-one percent of replanted thumbs and 54% of replanted fingers regained useful S2PD (less than 15 mm or greater than or equal to S3 +). Factors that influenced digital sensibility following replantation included patient's age, level and mechanism of injury, digital blood flow, cold intolerance, and postoperative sensory reeducation. Recovery of sensibility in the replanted digit is comparable to simple nerve repair and to nerve grafting techniques. Further emphasis should be on elucidating the mechanism of cold intolerance, which was a significant complaint for most replanted digits. The universal practice of postoperative sensory reeducation will continue to improve digital sensibility following replantation.
Similar articles
-
[Sensory recovery after finger replantation].Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1993 Jul;25(4):191-5. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1993. PMID: 8375757 German.
-
Digital sensibility following replantation.J Hand Surg Am. 1978 Jul;3(4):313-9. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(78)80030-6. J Hand Surg Am. 1978. PMID: 681714
-
Sensory recovery following total and subtotal amputations distal to the wrist and digital replantations.Chir Organi Mov. 1994 Apr-Jun;79(2):147-56. Chir Organi Mov. 1994. PMID: 7956516 English, Italian.
-
Sensory recovery in replanted digits and transplanted toes: a review.J Reconstr Microsurg. 1986 Jan;2(2):123-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1007013. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1986. PMID: 3511252 Review.
-
Advances in digital replantation.Clin Plast Surg. 1997 Jan;24(1):87-105. Clin Plast Surg. 1997. PMID: 9211031 Review.
Cited by
-
Self-reported symptoms of cold intolerance in workers with injuries of the hand.Hand (N Y). 2008 Sep;3(3):203-9. doi: 10.1007/s11552-008-9116-0. Epub 2008 Jul 3. Hand (N Y). 2008. PMID: 18780096 Free PMC article.
-
Efficiency in Digital and Hand Replantation.Clin Plast Surg. 2019 Jul;46(3):359-370. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Apr 16. Clin Plast Surg. 2019. PMID: 31103081 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Early clinical outcomes with the use of decellularized nerve allograft for repair of sensory defects within the hand.Hand (N Y). 2009 Sep;4(3):245-9. doi: 10.1007/s11552-009-9195-6. Epub 2009 May 2. Hand (N Y). 2009. PMID: 19412640 Free PMC article.
-
REPLANTATION OF THE THUMB OR REVISION OF AMPUTATION: AN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY.Acta Ortop Bras. 2024 Aug 2;32(3):e274165. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220243203e274165. eCollection 2024. Acta Ortop Bras. 2024. PMID: 39119249 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of Hand Function Following Digit Replantation: Quantitative Review and Meta-Analysis.Hand (N Y). 2021 Jan;16(1):11-17. doi: 10.1177/1558944719834658. Epub 2019 Apr 2. Hand (N Y). 2021. PMID: 30938181 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical