Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Dec 12:6:61.
doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-61.

The influence of a weight-bearing platform on the mechanical behavior of two Ilizarov ring fixators: tensioned wires vs. half-pins

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The influence of a weight-bearing platform on the mechanical behavior of two Ilizarov ring fixators: tensioned wires vs. half-pins

Jan Gessmann et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Background: A weight-bearing platform applied at the distal end of an Ilizarov external frame allows patients with hindfoot transfixations, foot deformities or plantar skin lesions to bear weight. This leads to an indirect loading of the fracture or osteotomy site. However, the effect on the fracture/osteotomy site's motion or compressive loads is unknown. The aim of this study was to analyze the mechanical effects of a weight-bearing platform on the traditional all-wire, four-ring frame in comparison to a two-ring frame consisting of half-pins.

Methods: Two frame configurations, with either anatomically positioned wires or half-pins, were analyzed with and without a weight-bearing platform applied underneath the distal ring. Composite tibiae with a mid-diaphyseal osteotomy of 3.5 mm were used in all the experiments. An axial load was applied with the use of a universal test machine (UTS®). Interfragmentary movements, the relative movements of bone fragments and movements between rings were recorded using displacement transducers. Compressive loads at the osteotomy site were recorded with loading cells.

Results: Indirect loading with a weight-bearing platform altered the force transmission through the osteotomy. Indirect loading of the tibiae decreased the extent of the axial micro-motion by 50% under the applied weight load when compared to direct weight loading (p < 0.05). The half pin frame was 25% stiffer than the wire frame under both direct and indirect loading of the tibiae (p < 0.05). Compressive loads under indirect loading were reduced by 67% in the wire frame and by 57% in the half-pin frames compared to direct loading of the bones (p < 0.05). While axial loading in the wire frames resulted in plain axial movements at the site of the osteotomy, it was coupled with translational movements and angular displacements in the half pin mountings. This effect was more apparent in the case of indirect loading.

Conclusions: A weight-bearing platform has substantial influence on the biomechanical performance of an Ilizarov external fixator. Half-pins induce greater stiffness to the Ilizarov external fixator and allow the usage of only one ring per bone segment, but shear stresses at the osteotomy under axial loading should be considered. The results allow an estimation of the size and direction of interfragmentary movements based on the extent of weight bearing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Clinical picture of a patient treated for mid-diaphyseal fractures with a weight-bearing platform because of foot ulcera and an insensate foot sole after compartment syndrome.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Experimental set-up of the wire frame under direct loading (both bone ends are mounted to the test machine) for measurements of the compressive loads in the osteotomy; the loading cell is placed into the osteotomy gap. (*) marks the loading cell in the osteotomy gap.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Experimental setup of the half-pin frame under indirect loading with displacement transducers. The connecting rods are distally extended to leave the distal bone fragment without direct contact to the base plate. The numbers label the arrangement of displacement transducers: 1-3: interfragmentary movements in the osteotomy (displacement transducer 3 out of sight behind the composite bone); 4-6: relative movement between rings; 7-8: relative movements of bone segments in relation to the ring level; (*) marks the Rancho cubes with half-pins.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Schematic drawing of the load transmission under direct (A) and indirect (B) loading.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean osteotomy gap pressures with standard deviations; x-axis: axial weight load (N); y-axis: osteotomy gap pressure (N).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Load-displacement curves for the different frame configurations; x-axis: interfragmentary movements (mm); y-axis: induced axial load (N).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Picture sequence demonstrating the translational displacement in the half-pin mounting at 0 N (A), 100 N (B), 300 N (C) and 600 N (D) under direct (top row) and indirect loading. All measurement devices have been removed in this sequence.

References

    1. Kershaw CJ, Cunningham JL, Kenwright J. Tibial external fixation, weight bearing, and fracture movement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993. pp. 28–36. - PubMed
    1. Fleming B, Paley D, Kristiansen T, Pope M. A biomechanical analysis of the Ilizarov external fixator. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989. pp. 95–105. - PubMed
    1. Mullins MM, Davidson AW, Goodier D, Barry M. The biomechanics of wire fixation in the Ilizarov system. Injury. 2003;34:155–157. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00262-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leung KS, Cheung WH, Yeung HY, Lee KM, Fung KP. Effect of weightbearing on bone formation during distraction osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004. pp. 251–257. - PubMed
    1. Lenarz C, Bledsoe G, Watson JT. Circular external fixation frames with divergent half pins: a pilot biomechanical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2933–2939. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0492-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources