Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Feb;119(2):227-32.
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

Randomized trial of pterygium surgery with mitomycin C application using conjunctival autograft versus conjunctival-limbal autograft

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized trial of pterygium surgery with mitomycin C application using conjunctival autograft versus conjunctival-limbal autograft

Ahmad Kheirkhah et al. Ophthalmology. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of free conjunctival autograft (CAU) versus conjunctival-limbal autograft (CLAU) in the prevention of recurrence after pterygium surgery with adjunctive mitomycin C application in patients with primary or recurrent pterygia.

Design: Prospective, randomized study.

Participants and controls: Eighty-seven eyes of 86 patients with primary or recurrent nasal pterygia were included.

Methods: All eyes underwent pterygium excision followed by removal of subconjunctival fibrovascular tissue and application of 0.02% mitomycin C for 3 minutes. The eyes then were assigned randomly to receive either CAU (44 eyes) or CLAU (43 eyes).

Main outcome measures: Rate of conjunctival or corneal recurrence of pterygium after surgery.

Results: A follow-up of at least 12 months (mean, 14 ± 2.2 months) was achieved in 78 eyes of 78 patients, including 39 eyes in the CAU group (31 primary and 8 recurrent pterygia) and 39 eyes in the CLAU group (33 primary and 6 recurrent pterygia). After surgery, no eye in the CLAU group developed pterygium recurrence; however, recurrence was seen in 2 eyes (5.1%) in the CAU group, including 1 of 31 patients (3.2%) with primary pterygia and 1 of 8 patients (12.5%) with recurrent pterygia. There was no statistically significant difference in recurrence rates between the 2 groups or in the primary and recurrent subgroups. In the CLAU group, a localized pannus formation at the donor site of the limbal graft was noted in 5 eyes (12.8%), with the appearance of pseudopterygium in 1 eye.

Conclusions: There was no significant difference in recurrence rates of pterygium after surgery with mitomycin C application between the CAU and CLAU groups, more remarkably in primary cases. Limbal damage was seen in some eyes with CLAU.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources