Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar;42(2):222-30.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.10.011. Epub 2011 Dec 5.

The impact of organizational stress and burnout on client engagement

Affiliations

The impact of organizational stress and burnout on client engagement

Brittany Landrum et al. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

This article explores the impact of organizational attributes on client engagement within substance abuse treatment. Previous research has identified organizational features, including small size, accreditation, and workplace practices, that impact client engagement (K. M. Broome, P. M. Flynn, D. K. Knight, & D. D. Simpson, 2007). This study sought to explore how aspects of the work environment impact client engagement. The sample included 89 programs located in 9 states across the United States. Work environment measures included counselor perceptions of stress, burnout, and work satisfaction at each program, whereas engagement measures included client ratings of participation, counseling rapport, and treatment satisfaction. Using multiple regression, tests of moderation and mediation revealed that staff stress negatively predicted client participation in treatment. Burnout was related to stress but was not related to participation. Two additional organizational measures--workload and influence--moderated the positive relationship between staff stress and burnout. Implications for drug treatment programs are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Moderating Effects of Influence and Number of Clients
Stress (Focal Predictor) and Moderators (Number of Clients and Influence) are divided into high and low categories corresponding to 1 SD above and below the mean.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary Findings

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman; New York: 1997.
    1. Bannister BD, Griffeth RW. Applying a causal analytic framework to the Mobley, Horner, and Hollingsworth (1978) Turnover Model: A useful reexamination. Journal of Management. 1986;12(3):433–443.
    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51:1173–1182. - PubMed
    1. Beck DF. Counselor burnout in family service agencies. The Journal of Contemporary Social Work. 1987;68:3–15.
    1. Belcastro P, Gold R, Grant J. Stress and burnout: Physiologic effects on correctional teachers. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 1982;9:387–395.

Publication types

MeSH terms