Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;55(1):90-5.
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182334121.

Perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal rectal excision

Affiliations

Perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal rectal excision

I S Martijnse et al. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Background: A perineal hernia can severely disable everyday activities. Its repair is a surgical challenge, and guidance by the literature is limited. The series described so far are small or encompass a long period in which even nonmesh techniques were used.

Objective: The aim of this study was to review recent results of a perineal mesh-based repair.

Patients: Medical charts of patients with a symptomatic perineal hernia after abdominoperineal resection due to rectal cancer were reviewed.

Main outcome measures: Data included patients' characteristics, operative details, recurrence, and complications.

Results: In total, 29 patients underwent repair of a symptomatic perineal hernia after an abdominoperineal resection due to rectal cancer. The majority was male (66%), and the median age was 59 years (range, 41-83). All patients received neoadjuvant treatment.From 2003 until 2006, polytetrafluoroethylene or Vypro mesh and Prolene 2.0 sutures were used for perineal hernia repair. All 8 repairs failed; repeated repair using various methods was successful in 63%. After 2006, the surgical technique was changed into a high-tension repair with the use of a nonabsorbable mesh. This technique was successful for 20 of 21 patients (95%). Complications encountered in the entire group of 29 patients were urinary retention (n = 2), wound infection, seroma, and fistula (n = 1 each).

Limitations: Even though this is the largest group described in the literature, the results are limited because of the small number of patients.

Conclusion: Repair of perineal hernia remains challenging and only a few reports offer advice on how to manage this unusual problem. However, superior results have been shown with the new mesh-based technique through perineal approach with only 5% recurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources