Indications and outcomes following complex abdominal reconstruction with component separation combined with porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement
- PMID: 22156887
- DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822f997b
Indications and outcomes following complex abdominal reconstruction with component separation combined with porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement
Abstract
Purpose: Component separation (CS) is an effective technique for complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). Reinforcement of the repair with mesh can add durability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the indications and outcomes following CS combined with a porcine acellular dermal matrix (PADM) for reinforcement.
Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent complex AWR at the authors' institution was completed between 2007 and 2010. Patients with complex hernias who underwent CS in conjunction with PADM as an underlay were included. The PADM used in this cohort was Strattice (LifeCell Corporation, Branchburg, NJ). Patient demographics, indications, perioperative details, postoperative care, and long-term outcomes were reviewed.
Results: A total of 78 patients were identified as having PADM implanted for AWR. Of this cohort, 41 patients met the criteria as having a CS to achieve midline closure, with the PADM placed as reinforcement in an underlay manner. These patients were classified as grade II (33; 80.5%), grade III (4; 9.8%), and grade IV (4; 9.8%). Average patient age was 57.6 years (range, 33-80), and average body mass index (BMI) was 35.8 kg/m2 (range, 21.6-52.1). Patient comorbidities included coronary artery disease (19; 46.3%), diabetes mellitus (14; 34.2%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (6; 14.6%), and chronic steroid use (2; 4.9%). Previous mesh infection occurred in 9 (28.1%). The mean defect diameter was found to be 14.3 cm. Perforator preservation of the subcutaneous flaps was performed in 34 (82.9%) patients. A concomitant panniculectomy was performed in 9 (22%) patients. A staged approach was used in 3 (7.3%) patients. The overall complication rate was 24.4%. Strattice exposure occurred in 5 (12.2%) patients. All patients went on to heal wounds without explantation.No hernia recurrences or symptomatic bulges were observed in the follow-up period of 474 days (range, 194-1017 days). No significant predictors of complications were identified.
Conclusions: Strattice is an effective adjunct to AWR when used as reinforcement during CS for a wide variety of indications. Complication rates remain low in complex patients. In addition, Strattice appears to add durability to midline reconstructions with no recurrences during the follow-up period.
Similar articles
-
The use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in a bridge technique for complex abdominal wall reconstruction: an outcome analysis.Am J Surg. 2013 Feb;205(2):209-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.031. Epub 2012 Nov 27. Am J Surg. 2013. PMID: 23195145
-
Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction.J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec;217(6):999-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Sep 29. J Am Coll Surg. 2013. PMID: 24083910
-
Component separation with porcine acellular dermal reinforcement is superior to traditional bridged mesh repairs in the open repair of significant midline ventral hernia defects.Am Surg. 2014 Aug;80(8):725-31. Am Surg. 2014. PMID: 25105388 Free PMC article.
-
Porcine acellular dermal matrix (PADM) vascularises after exposure in open necrotic wounds seen after complex hernia repair.Int Wound J. 2016 Oct;13(5):972-6. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12558. Epub 2015 Dec 21. Int Wound J. 2016. PMID: 26688300 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The use of Permacol™ mesh in contaminated complex abdominal wall defects.Surg Technol Int. 2013 Sep;23:117-21. Surg Technol Int. 2013. PMID: 23686799 Review.
Cited by
-
Non-crosslinked porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix for the management of complex ventral abdominal wall hernias: a report of 45 cases.Hernia. 2014 Feb;18(1):71-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1148-x. Epub 2013 Aug 10. Hernia. 2014. PMID: 23934355 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic versus open component separation: systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):787-95. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3741-1. Epub 2014 Jul 25. Surg Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25060687
-
Improved outcomes in the management of high-risk incisional hernias utilizing biological mesh and soft-tissue reconstruction: a single center experience.World J Surg. 2014 May;38(5):1026-34. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2442-6. World J Surg. 2014. PMID: 24390228
-
A meta-analysis comparing open anterior component separation with posterior component separation and transversus abdominis release in the repair of midline ventral hernias.Hernia. 2018 Aug;22(4):617-626. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1757-5. Epub 2018 Mar 7. Hernia. 2018. PMID: 29516294 Review.
-
[Use of biological meshes in abdominal wall reconstruction. Results of a survey in Germany].Chirurg. 2015 Feb;86(2):164-71. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2760-8. Chirurg. 2015. PMID: 24969342 German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous