Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review
- PMID: 22157097
- DOI: 10.1177/0022034511431252
Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the most frequently used criteria to define treatment success in implant dentistry. An electronic MEDLINE/PubMED search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials and prospective studies reporting on outcomes of implant dentistry. Only studies conducted with roughened surface implants and at least five-year follow-up were included. Data were analyzed for success at the implant level, peri-implant soft tissue, prosthetics, and patient satisfaction. Most frequently reported criteria for success at the implant level were mobility, pain, radiolucency, and peri-implant bone loss (> 1.5 mm), and for success at the peri-implant soft-tissue level, suppuration, and bleeding. The criteria for success at the prosthetic level were the occurrence of technical complications/prosthetic maintenance, adequate function, and esthetics during the five-year period. The criteria at patient satisfaction level were discomfort and paresthesia, satisfaction with appearance, and ability to chew/taste. Success in implant dentistry should ideally evaluate a long-term primary outcome of an implant-prosthetic complex as a whole.
Similar articles
-
Soft tissue management for dental implants: what are the most effective techniques? A Cochrane systematic review.Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012 Autumn;5(3):221-38. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012. PMID: 23000707
-
Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review.Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Spring;3(1):7-26. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010. PMID: 20467595
-
A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years.J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29 Suppl 3:197-212; discussion 232-3. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.29.s3.12.x. J Clin Periodontol. 2002. PMID: 12787220
-
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;(1):CD003815. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003815.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD003815. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003815.pub3. PMID: 15674915 Updated.
-
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD006697. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006697.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22336822 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Establishment of Epithelial Attachment on Titanium Surface Coated with Platelet Activating Peptide.PLoS One. 2016 Oct 14;11(10):e0164693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164693. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27741287 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of restoration material on marginal bone resorption around modified anatomic zirconia dental implants: A randomised controlled trial.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Aug 2;80:104313. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104313. eCollection 2022 Aug. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022. PMID: 36045765 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness, Esthetics, and Success Rate of Dental Implants in Bone-Grafted Regions of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2023 Nov 20;15(11):e49101. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49101. eCollection 2023 Nov. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38125258 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Success of Xenografts in Alveolar Ridge Preservation Based on Histomorphometric Outcomes.Dent J (Basel). 2023 Sep 13;11(9):215. doi: 10.3390/dj11090215. Dent J (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37754335 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Osteotomy combined with the trephine technique for invisible implant fracture: A case report.World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jun 6;10(16):5479-5486. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i16.5479. World J Clin Cases. 2022. PMID: 35812684 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical