Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;23(1):95-106.
doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31823b504c.

Fecal indicators in sand, sand contact, and risk of enteric illness among beachgoers

Affiliations

Fecal indicators in sand, sand contact, and risk of enteric illness among beachgoers

Christopher D Heaney et al. Epidemiology. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Beach sand can harbor fecal indicator organisms and pathogens, but enteric illness risk associated with sand contact remains unclear.

Methods: In 2007, visitors at 2 recreational marine beaches were asked on the day of their visit about sand contact. Ten to 12 days later, participants answered questions about health symptoms since the visit. F+ coliphage, Enterococcus, Bacteroidales, fecal Bacteroides, and Clostridium spp. in wet sand were measured using culture and molecular methods.

Results: We analyzed 144 wet sand samples and completed 4999 interviews. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were computed, comparing those in the highest tertile of fecal indicator exposure with those who reported no sand contact. Among those digging in sand compared with those not digging in sand, a molecular measure of Enterococcus spp. (calibrator cell equivalents/g) in sand was positively associated with gastrointestinal (GI) illness (aOR = 2.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-3.2]) and diarrhea (2.4 [1.4-4.2]). Among those buried in sand, point estimates were greater for GI illness (3.3 [1.3-7.9]) and diarrhea (4.9 [1.8-13]). Positive associations were also observed for culture-based Enterococcus (colony-forming units/g) with GI illness (aOR digging = 1.7 [1.1-2.7]) and diarrhea (2.1 [1.3-3.4]). Associations were not found among nonswimmers with sand exposure.

Conclusions: We observed a positive relationship between sand-contact activities and enteric illness as a function of concentrations of fecal microbial pollution in beach sand.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kinzelman J, McLellan SL, Daniels AD, Cashin S, Singh A, Gradus S, Bagley R. Non-point source pollution: determination of replication versus persistence of Escherichia coli in surface water and sediments with correlation of levels to readily measurable environmental parameters. J Water Health. 2004;2(2):103–14. - PubMed
    1. Skalbeck JD, Kinzelman JL, Mayer GC. Fecal indicator organism density in beach sands: Impact of sediment grain size, uniformity, and hydrologic factors on surface water loading. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 2010;36(4)
    1. Wheeler Alm E, Burke J, Spain A. Fecal indicator bacteria are abundant in wet sand at freshwater beaches. Water Res. 2003;37(16):3978–3982. - PubMed
    1. Whitman RL, Nevers MB. Foreshore sand as a source of Escherichia coli in nearshore water of a Lake Michigan beach. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69(9):5555–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonilla TD, Nowosielski K, Cuvelier M, Hartz A, Green M, Esiobu N, McCorquodale DS, Fleisher JM, Rogerson A. Prevalence and distribution of fecal indicator organisms in South Florida beach sand and preliminary assessment of health effects associated with beach sand exposure. Mar Pollut Bull. 2007;54(9):1472–82. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances