Angiotensin II-antagonist in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (ANTIPAF) trial
- PMID: 22157519
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.965178
Angiotensin II-antagonist in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (ANTIPAF) trial
Abstract
Background: Unlike antiarrhythmic drugs, the safety and beneficial effects of angiotensin II receptor blockade (ARB) in patients with structural heart disease is well established. The clinical efficacy of ARBs to prevent atrial fibrillation (AF) so far only has been shown in patients with structural heart disease. Here, we report the primary outcome of the Angiotensin II-Antagonist in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (ANTIPAF) trial, which investigated the effect of olmesartan medoxomil compared with placebo on AF burden in patients with paroxysmal AF without structural heart disease.
Methods and results: The ANTIPAF trial was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial analyzing the AF burden (percentage of days with documented episodes of paroxysmal AF) during a 12-month follow-up as the primary study end point. Four hundred thirty patients with documented paroxysmal AF without structural heart disease were randomized to placebo or 40 mg olmesartan per day. Concomitant therapy with ARBs, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and antiarrhythmic drugs was prohibited. Patients were followed using daily transtelephonic ECG (tele-ECG) recordings independent of symptoms. The intention-to-treat population of the trial encompassed 425 patients (placebo group, n=211; olmesartan group, n=214). A total of 87 818 tele-ECGs were analyzed in these patients during follow-up (placebo group, 44 888 ECGs; olmesartan group, 42 930 ECGs). Thus, a mean of 207 tele-ECGs were recorded per patient. The primary end point (AF burden) was not different between the 2 groups (P=0.770). Secondary outcome parameters, including quality of life, also were not different. In particular, time to first AF recurrence, time to persistent AF, and number of hospitalizations were not different between the 2 groups. The time to prescription of recovery medication (amiodarone) was the only parameter showing an intergroup difference, with earlier prescription of amiodarone in the placebo group (P=0.022).
Conclusions: One year of ARB therapy per se does not reduce the number of AF episodes in patients with documented paroxysmal AF without structural heart disease. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00098137.
Similar articles
-
Angiotensin II antagonist in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (ANTIPAF) trial: rationale and study design.Clin Drug Investig. 2007;27(10):697-705. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200727100-00005. Clin Drug Investig. 2007. PMID: 17803345 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical characteristics of patients with asymptomatic recurrences of atrial fibrillation in the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico-Atrial Fibrillation (GISSI-AF) trial.Am Heart J. 2011 Aug;162(2):382-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.05.008. Epub 2011 Jul 7. Am Heart J. 2011. PMID: 21835301 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized trial of angiotensin II-receptor blocker vs. dihydropiridine calcium channel blocker in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with hypertension (J-RHYTHM II study).Europace. 2011 Apr;13(4):473-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq439. Epub 2010 Dec 10. Europace. 2011. PMID: 21148662 Clinical Trial.
-
[Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation with systematic screening using tele-ECG--relevance for anticoagulation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation].Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2005 Sep;16(3):159-64. doi: 10.1007/s00399-005-0475-8. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2005. PMID: 16177942 Review. German.
-
Possible molecular mechanisms by which angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) prevent the development of atrial fibrillation in insulin resistant patients.Horm Metab Res. 2008 Sep;40(9):640-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1083811. Epub 2008 Sep 15. Horm Metab Res. 2008. PMID: 18792876 Review.
Cited by
-
Blood pressure control versus atrial fibrillation management in stroke prevention.Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015 Jun;17(6):553. doi: 10.1007/s11906-015-0553-1. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015. PMID: 25893476 Review.
-
Hypertension and Arrhythmias: A Clinical Overview of the Pathophysiology-Driven Management of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Hypertensive Patients.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Apr 6;9(4):110. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9040110. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022. PMID: 35448086 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Angiotensin II and angiotensin 1-7: which is their role in atrial fibrillation?Heart Fail Rev. 2020 Mar;25(2):367-380. doi: 10.1007/s10741-019-09837-7. Heart Fail Rev. 2020. PMID: 31375968 Review.
-
2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.Circulation. 2014 Dec 2;130(23):e199-267. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000041. Epub 2014 Mar 28. Circulation. 2014. PMID: 24682347 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Biomarkers of Atrial Fibrillation: Which One Is a True Marker?Cardiol Res Pract. 2019 Apr 1;2019:8302326. doi: 10.1155/2019/8302326. eCollection 2019. Cardiol Res Pract. 2019. PMID: 31061732 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical