Redefining the roles of sensors in objective physical activity monitoring
- PMID: 22157770
- PMCID: PMC3245644
- DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399bc8
Redefining the roles of sensors in objective physical activity monitoring
Abstract
Background: Because physical activity researchers are increasingly using objective portable devices, this review describes the current state of the technology to assess physical activity, with a focus on specific sensors and sensor properties currently used in monitors and their strengths and weaknesses. Additional sensors and sensor properties desirable for activity measurement and best practices for users and developers also are discussed.
Best practices: We grouped current sensors into three broad categories for objectively measuring physical activity: associated body movement, physiology, and context. Desirable sensor properties for measuring physical activity and the importance of these properties in relationship to specific applications are addressed, and the specific roles of transducers and data acquisition systems within the monitoring devices are defined. Technical advancements in sensors, microcomputer processors, memory storage, batteries, wireless communication, and digital filters have made monitors more usable for subjects (smaller, more stable, and longer running time) and for researchers (less costly, higher time resolution and memory storage, shorter download time, and user-defined data features).
Future directions: Users and developers of physical activity monitors should learn about the basic properties of their sensors, such as range, accuracy, and precision, while considering the data acquisition/filtering steps that may be critical to data quality and may influence the desirable measurement outcome(s).
Figures
References
-
- Badland H, Schofield G. Transport, urban design, and physical activity: an evidence-based update. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment. 2005;10(3):177–196.
-
- Bassett DR., Jr Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000;71(2 Suppl):S30–S36. - PubMed
-
- Brage S, Brage N, Franks PW, et al. Reliability and validity of the combined heart rate and movement sensor Actiheart. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59(4):561–570. - PubMed
-
- Brage S, Wedderkopp N, Andersen LB, et al. Influence of step frequency on movement intensity predictions with the CSA accelerometer: A field validation study in children. Pediatric Exercise Science. 2003;15(3):277–287.
-
- Brage S, Wedderkopp N, Franks PW, et al. Reexamination of validity and reliability of the CSA monitor in walking and running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1447–1454. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
