New horizons in sensor development
- PMID: 22157771
- PMCID: PMC3245518
- DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399c7d
New horizons in sensor development
Abstract
Background: Accelerometry and other sensing technologies are important tools for physical activity measurement. Engineering advances have allowed developers to transform clunky, uncomfortable, and conspicuous monitors into relatively small, ergonomic, and convenient research tools. New devices can be used to collect data on overall physical activity and, in some cases, posture, physiological state, and location, for many days or weeks from subjects during their everyday lives. In this review article, we identify emerging trends in several types of monitoring technologies and gaps in the current state of knowledge.
Best practices: The only certainty about the future of activity-sensing technologies is that researchers must anticipate and plan for change. We propose a set of best practices that may accelerate adoption of new devices and increase the likelihood that data being collected and used today will be compatible with new data sets and methods likely to appear on the horizon.
Future directions: We describe several technology-driven trends, ranging from continued miniaturization of devices that provide gross summary information about activity levels and energy expenditure to new devices that provide highly detailed information about the specific type, amount, and location of physical activity. Some devices will take advantage of consumer technologies, such as mobile phones, to detect and respond to physical activity in real time, creating new opportunities in measurement, remote compliance monitoring, data-driven discovery, and intervention.
Conflict of interest statement
Stephen Intille, Jonathan Lester, Glen Duncan – None. James Sallis – Stockholder of Santech. The ideas presented here do not constitute endorsement by the ACSM.
Similar articles
-
Calibration and validation of wearable monitors.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jan;44(1 Suppl 1):S32-8. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399cf7. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012. PMID: 22157772 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessment of physical activity using wearable monitors: recommendations for monitor calibration and use in the field.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jan;44(1 Suppl 1):S1-4. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399b7e. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012. PMID: 22157769 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing physical activity using wearable monitors: measures of physical activity.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jan;44(1 Suppl 1):S5-12. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399c0e. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012. PMID: 22157774 Review.
-
A review of accelerometry-based wearable motion detectors for physical activity monitoring.Sensors (Basel). 2010;10(8):7772-88. doi: 10.3390/s100807772. Epub 2010 Aug 20. Sensors (Basel). 2010. PMID: 22163626 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Which indicators for measuring the daily physical activity? An overview on the challenges and technology limits for Telehealth applications.Technol Health Care. 2016 Sep 14;24(5):665-72. doi: 10.3233/THC-161216. Technol Health Care. 2016. PMID: 27198463 Review.
Cited by
-
Momentary assessment of adults' physical activity and sedentary behavior: feasibility and validity.Front Psychol. 2012 Jul 30;3:260. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00260. eCollection 2012. Front Psychol. 2012. PMID: 22866046 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of accelerometer type and placement on physical activity energy expenditure prediction in manual wheelchair users.PLoS One. 2015 May 8;10(5):e0126086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126086. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25955304 Free PMC article.
-
Interest and preferences for using advanced physical activity tracking devices: results of a national cross-sectional survey.BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 7;6(7):e011243. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011243. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27388359 Free PMC article.
-
Office-based physical activity: mapping a social ecological model approach against COM-B.BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8280-1. BMC Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32013952 Free PMC article.
-
Review of self-reported physical activity assessments for pregnancy: summary of the evidence for validity and reliability.Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012 Sep;26(5):479-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01311.x. Epub 2012 Jul 5. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012. PMID: 22882792 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Achten J, Jeukendrup AE. Heart rate monitoring: Applications and limitations. Sports Med. 2003;33(7):517–538. - PubMed
-
- Amft O, Tröster G. Recognition of dietary activity events using on-body sensors. Artif Intel Med. 2008;42(2):121–136. - PubMed
-
- Bao L, Intille SS. Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. In: Ferscha A, Mattern F, editors. Proc of PERVASIVE. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2004. pp. 1–17. Vol. LNCS 3001.
-
- Bonami AG, Goris AHC, Yin B, Westerterp KR. Detection of type, duration, and intensity of physical activity using an accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(9):1770–1777. - PubMed
-
- Brownson RC, Hoehner CM, Brennan LK, Cook RA, Elliott MB, McMullen KM. Reliability of two instruments for auditing the environment for physical activity. J Phys Act Health. 2004;1:189–207.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources