Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Jan;44(1 Suppl 1):S32-8.
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399cf7.

Calibration and validation of wearable monitors

Affiliations
Review

Calibration and validation of wearable monitors

David R Bassett Jr et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Wearable monitors are increasingly being used to objectively monitor physical activity in research studies within the field of exercise science. Calibration and validation of these devices are vital to obtaining accurate data. This article is aimed primarily at the physical activity measurement specialist, although the end user who is conducting studies with these devices also may benefit from knowing about this topic.

Best practices: Initially, wearable physical activity monitors should undergo unit calibration to ensure interinstrument reliability. The next step is to simultaneously collect both raw signal data (e.g., acceleration) from the wearable monitors and rates of energy expenditure, so that algorithms can be developed to convert the direct signals into energy expenditure. This process should use multiple wearable monitors and a large and diverse subject group and should include a wide range of physical activities commonly performed in daily life (from sedentary to vigorous).

Future directions: New methods of calibration now use "pattern recognition" approaches to train the algorithms on various activities, and they provide estimates of energy expenditure that are much better than those previously available with the single-regression approach. Once a method of predicting energy expenditure has been established, the next step is to examine its predictive accuracy by cross-validating it in other populations. In this article, we attempt to summarize the best practices for calibration and validation of wearable physical activity monitors. Finally, we conclude with some ideas for future research ideas that will move the field of physical activity measurement forward.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, et al. Compendium of Physical Activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9):S498–S516. - PubMed
    1. Bassett DR, Ainsworth BE, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O'Brien WL, King GA. Validity of 4 motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9):S471–S80. - PubMed
    1. Bonomi AG, Plasqui G, Goris AH, Westerterp KR. Improving the assessment of daily energy expenditure by identifying types of physical acctivity using a single accelerometer. J Appl Physiol. 2009;107(3):655–61. - PubMed
    1. Brage S, Brage N, Franks PW, et al. Branched equation modeling of simultaneous accelerometry and heart rate monitoring improves estimate of directly measured physical activity energy expenditure. J Appl Physiol. 2004;96(1):343–351. - PubMed
    1. Brage S, Ekelund U, Brage N, et al. Hierarchy of individual calibration levels for heart rate and acceletometry to measure physical activity. J Appl Physiol. 2007;103(2):689–92. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms