Calibration and validation of wearable monitors
- PMID: 22157772
- PMCID: PMC3273335
- DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399cf7
Calibration and validation of wearable monitors
Abstract
Background: Wearable monitors are increasingly being used to objectively monitor physical activity in research studies within the field of exercise science. Calibration and validation of these devices are vital to obtaining accurate data. This article is aimed primarily at the physical activity measurement specialist, although the end user who is conducting studies with these devices also may benefit from knowing about this topic.
Best practices: Initially, wearable physical activity monitors should undergo unit calibration to ensure interinstrument reliability. The next step is to simultaneously collect both raw signal data (e.g., acceleration) from the wearable monitors and rates of energy expenditure, so that algorithms can be developed to convert the direct signals into energy expenditure. This process should use multiple wearable monitors and a large and diverse subject group and should include a wide range of physical activities commonly performed in daily life (from sedentary to vigorous).
Future directions: New methods of calibration now use "pattern recognition" approaches to train the algorithms on various activities, and they provide estimates of energy expenditure that are much better than those previously available with the single-regression approach. Once a method of predicting energy expenditure has been established, the next step is to examine its predictive accuracy by cross-validating it in other populations. In this article, we attempt to summarize the best practices for calibration and validation of wearable physical activity monitors. Finally, we conclude with some ideas for future research ideas that will move the field of physical activity measurement forward.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of physical activity using wearable monitors: recommendations for monitor calibration and use in the field.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jan;44(1 Suppl 1):S1-4. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399b7e. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012. PMID: 22157769 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing physical activity using wearable monitors: measures of physical activity.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jan;44(1 Suppl 1):S5-12. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399c0e. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012. PMID: 22157774 Review.
-
Modeling physical activity outcomes from wearable monitors.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jan;44(1 Suppl 1):S50-60. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399dcc. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012. PMID: 22157775
-
Calibration and validation of accelerometer-based activity monitors: A systematic review of machine-learning approaches.Gait Posture. 2019 Feb;68:285-299. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 5. Gait Posture. 2019. PMID: 30579037
-
Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children.Obes Res. 2002 Mar;10(3):150-7. doi: 10.1038/oby.2002.24. Obes Res. 2002. PMID: 11886937
Cited by
-
Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review.Geriatrics (Basel). 2021 Apr 7;6(2):38. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics6020038. Geriatrics (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33917104 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Validation of the Fitbit One® for physical activity measurement at an upper torso attachment site.BMC Res Notes. 2016 Apr 12;9:213. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2020-8. BMC Res Notes. 2016. PMID: 27068022 Free PMC article.
-
Wearable technologies for active living and rehabilitation: Current research challenges and future opportunities.J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2019 Apr 26;6:2055668319839607. doi: 10.1177/2055668319839607. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2019. PMID: 31245033 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Replacing sedentary time with physical activity: a 15-year follow-up of mortality in a national cohort.Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jan 25;10:179-186. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S151613. eCollection 2018. Clin Epidemiol. 2018. PMID: 29416378 Free PMC article.
-
Exercise and the Development of the Artificial Pancreas: One of the More Difficult Series of Hurdles.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Oct 1;9(6):1217-26. doi: 10.1177/1932296815609370. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015. PMID: 26428933 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, et al. Compendium of Physical Activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9):S498–S516. - PubMed
-
- Bassett DR, Ainsworth BE, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O'Brien WL, King GA. Validity of 4 motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9):S471–S80. - PubMed
-
- Bonomi AG, Plasqui G, Goris AH, Westerterp KR. Improving the assessment of daily energy expenditure by identifying types of physical acctivity using a single accelerometer. J Appl Physiol. 2009;107(3):655–61. - PubMed
-
- Brage S, Brage N, Franks PW, et al. Branched equation modeling of simultaneous accelerometry and heart rate monitoring improves estimate of directly measured physical activity energy expenditure. J Appl Physiol. 2004;96(1):343–351. - PubMed
-
- Brage S, Ekelund U, Brage N, et al. Hierarchy of individual calibration levels for heart rate and acceletometry to measure physical activity. J Appl Physiol. 2007;103(2):689–92. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical