Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Dec;20(2):171-80.
doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0036).

Cortical high-gamma responses in auditory processing

Affiliations
Review

Cortical high-gamma responses in auditory processing

Mackenzie C Cervenka et al. Am J Audiol. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: This tutorial provides an introduction to cortical auditory spectral responses, focusing on event-related activity in the high-gamma frequencies (60-150 Hz), their recent emergence in neuroscience research, and potential clinical applications.

Method: Auditory high-gamma responses are described and compared with traditional cortical evoked responses, including the auditory evoked N1 response. Methods for acquiring and analyzing spectral responses, including time-frequency analyses, are discussed and contrasted with more familiar time-domain averaging approaches. Four cases are presented illustrating high-gamma response patterns associated with normal and impaired auditory processing.

Conclusions: Cortical auditory high-gamma responses may provide a useful clinical measure of auditory processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Single-channel normal electroencephalogram recordings showing the five major frequencies: delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma. Time (in seconds) is on the horizontal axis; amplitude (in decibels) is on the vertical axis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Auditory high-gamma responses recorded with four different auditory stimuli from the same electrode site in a patient with normal auditory processing abilities (Case 1). Stimulus conditions are (A) tones (1200 Hz); (B) speech (/da/); (C) 40-Hz amplitude-modulated tone (carrier frequency = 1000 Hz); and (D) white noise. In (C), an auditory steady-state response is also visible at the tone amplitude modulation rate (40 Hz). Time is on the horizontal axis in seconds (0–0.4 s). Frequency is on the vertical axis in hertz (0–150 Hz). Statistically significant changes are color-coded, with red representing the largest increase in power (dB) from the prestimulus baseline, shown in blue.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Auditory high-gamma responses recorded with the syllable /da/ from the same electrode in a patient with normal auditory processing abilities (Case 1) using (A) a passive oddball paradigm and (B) an active oddball paradigm. Time is on the horizontal axis in seconds (0–0.2 s). Frequency is on the vertical axis in hertz (0–150 Hz). Statistically significant changes are color-coded, with red representing the largest increase in power (dB) from the prestimulus baseline, shown in blue.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Auditory high-gamma responses recorded from a patient with impaired auditory processing abilities (Case 2). Responses were elicited with (A) tones (1200 Hz) and (B) speech (/da/). Time is on the horizontal axis in seconds (0–0.3 s). Frequency is on the vertical axis in hertz (0–150 Hz). Statistically significant changes are color-coded, with red representing the largest increase in power (dB) from the prestimulus baseline, shown in blue.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Intracranial recording results from two patients with implanted left hemisphere electrodes. Electrode locations have been coregistered with each patient’s three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging brain reconstructions; the lateral left view is shown. (A) Results from a patient with normal auditory processing abilities (Case 3). Top inset box shows evoked tone N1 response (waveform has been smoothed for display); middle inset box shows high-gamma response to same tone; bottom inset box shows high-gamma response to speech. (B) Results from a patient with auditory processing difficulties (Case 4). Evoked N1 response is shown in the top inset box (waveform has been smoothed for display); high-gamma response to tones is shown in the bottom inset box. Auditory speech recordings were not performed with the second patient.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adrian ED, Matthews BH. The Berger rhythm: Potential alterations form the occipital lobes in man. Brain. 1934;57:355–385.
    1. Alho K, Medvedev SV, Pakhomov SV, Roudas MS, Tervaniemi M, Reinikainen K, Naatanen R. Selective tuning of the left and right auditory cortices during spatially directed attention. Cognitive Brain Research. 1999;7:335–341. - PubMed
    1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (Central) auditory processing disorders [Technical report] 2005 Available from www.asha.org/policy.
    1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Task Force on Central Auditory Processing Consensus Development. Central auditory processing: Current status of research and implications for clinical practice. American Journal of Audiology. 1996;5(2):41–54.
    1. Ball T, Demandt E, Mutschler I, Neitzel E, Mehring C, Vogt K, Schulze-Bonhage A. Movement related activity in the high gamma range of the human EEG. NeuroImage. 2008;41:302–310. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources