Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD008273.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008273.pub2.

Information interventions for orienting patients and their carers to cancer care facilities

Raymond J Chan  1 , Joan Webster, Louise Marquart
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Information interventions for orienting patients and their carers to cancer care facilities

Raymond J Chan et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Cancer patients experience distress and anxiety related to their diagnosis, treatment and the unfamiliar cancer centre. Strategies with the aim of orienting patients to a cancer care facility may improve patient outcomes. Although meeting patients' information needs at different stages is important, there is little agreement about the type of information and the timing for information to be given. Orientation interventions aim to address information needs at the start of a person's experience with a cancer care facility. The extent of any benefit of these interventions is unknown.

Objectives: To assess the effects of information interventions which orient patients and their carers/family to a cancer care facility, and to the services available in the facility.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 2); MEDLINE (OvidSP) (1966 to Jun 2011), EMBASE (Ovid SP) (1966 to Jun 2011), CINAHL (EBSCO) (1982 to Jun 2011), PsycINFO (OvidSP) (1966 to Jun 2011), review articles and reference lists of relevant articles. We contacted principal investigators and experts in the field.

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster RCTs and quasi-RCTs evaluating the effects of information interventions that orient patients and their carers/family to a cancer care facility.

Data collection and analysis: Results of searches were reviewed against the pre-determined criteria for inclusion by two review authors. The primary outcomes were knowledge and understanding; health status and wellbeing, evaluation of care, and harms. Secondary outcomes were communication, skills acquisition, behavioural outcomes, service delivery, and health professional outcomes. We pooled results of RCTs using mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Main results: We included four RCTs involving 610 participants. All four trials aimed to investigate the effects of orientation programs for cancer patients to a cancer facility. There was high risk of bias across studies. Findings from two of the RCTs demonstrated significant benefits of the orientation intervention in relation to levels of distress (mean difference (MD) -8.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) -11.79 to -6.13), but non-significant benefits in relation to state anxiety levels (MD -9.77 (95% CI -24.96 to 5.41). Other outcomes for participants were generally positive (e.g. more knowledgeable about the cancer centre and cancer therapy, better coping abilities). No harms or adverse effects were measured or reported by any of the included studies. There were insufficient data on the other outcomes of interest.

Authors' conclusions: This review has demonstrated the feasibility and some potential benefits of orientation interventions. There was a low level of evidence suggesting that orientation interventions can reduce distress in patients. However, most of the other outcomes remain inconclusive (patient knowledge recall/ satisfaction). The majority of studies were subject to high risk of bias, and were likely to be insufficiently powered. Further well conducted and powered RCTs are required to provide evidence for determining the most appropriate intensity, nature, mode and resources for such interventions. Patient and carer-focused outcomes should be included.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
3
3
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
4
4
Analysis 2.1: Interventions to reduce anxiety compared with control, State anxiety (STAI‐S)
5
5
Analysis 3.1: Interventions to reduce distress compared with control, Profile of Mood State ‐ Total Mood Disturbance (POMS‐TMD)
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Interventions to increase knowledge compared with control, Outcome 1 Radiation knowledge.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Interventions to reduce anxiety compared with control, Outcome 1 State Anxiety (STAI‐S).
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 Interventions to reduce anxiety compared with control, Outcome 2 Trait Anxiety (STAI‐T).
2.3
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2 Interventions to reduce anxiety compared with control, Outcome 3 Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) ‐ Anxiety.
3.1
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3 Interventions to reduce distress compared with control, Outcome 1 Profile of Mood State ‐ Total Mood Disturbance.
3.2
3.2. Analysis
Comparison 3 Interventions to reduce distress compared with control, Outcome 2 Emotional distress (General Severity Index).
4.1
4.1. Analysis
Comparison 4 Interventions to reduce depression compared with control, Outcome 1 Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) ‐ Depression.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Burish 1991 {published data only}
    1. Burish T, Snyder S, Jenkins R. Preparing patients for cancer chemotherapy: effect of coping preparation and relaxation interventions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1991;59:518‐25. - PubMed
Hoff 2005 {published data only}
    1. Hoff A, Haaga D. Effects of an education program on radiation oncology patients and families. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology 2005;23(4):61‐77. - PubMed
McQuellon 1998 {published data only}
    1. McQuellon R, Wells M, Hoffman S, Craven B, Russell G, Cruz J, et al. Reducing distress in cancer patients with an orientation program. Psycho‐oncology 1998;7:207‐17. - PubMed
Mohide 1996 {published data only}
    1. Mohide E, Whelan T, Rath D, Gafni A, Willan A, Czukar D. A randomised trial of two information packages distributed to new cancer patients before their initial appointment at a regional cancer centre. British Journal of Cancer 1996;73:1588‐93. - PMC - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Aranda 2011 {published data only}
    1. Aranda S, Jefford M, Yates P, Gough K, Seymour J, Francis P, et al. Impact of a novel nurse‐led prechemotherapy education intervention (ChemoEd) on patient distress, symptom burden, and treatment‐related information and support needs: results from a randomised, controlled trial. Annals of Oncology 2011;Advance Access published 6 April 2011. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr042] - DOI - PubMed
Campbell 2010 {published data only}
    1. Campbell C, Craig J, Eggert J, Bailey‐Dorton C. Implementing and measuring the impact of patient navigation at a comprehensive community cancer center. Oncology Nursing Forum 2010;37(1):61‐8. - PubMed
Carey 2007 {published data only}
    1. Carey M, Schofield P, Jefford M, Krishnasamy M, Aranda S. The development of audio‐visual materials to prepare patients for medical procedures: an oncology application. European Journal of Cancer Care 2007;16:417‐23. - PubMed
Deshler 2006 {published data only}
    1. Deshler A, Fee‐Schroeder K, Dowdy J, Mettler T, Novotny P, Zhao X, et al. A patient orientation program at a comprehensive cancer centre. Oncology Nursing Forum 2006;33(3):569‐78. - PubMed
Dubois 2008 {published data only}
    1. Dubois S, Loiselle C. Understanding the role of cancer informational support in relation to health care service use among newly diagnosed individuals. Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal 2008;18(4):193‐205. - PubMed
Gallant 2003 {published data only}
    1. Gallant MD, Coutts LM. Evaluation of an oncology outpatient orientation program: patient satisfaction and outcomes. Supportive Care in Cancer 2003;11(12):800‐5. - PubMed
Hutchison 2007 {published data only}
    1. Hutchison C, McCreaddie M. The process of developing audiovisual patient information: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2007;16(11):2047‐55. - PubMed
Jones 1999 {published data only}
    1. Jones R, Pearson J, McGregor S, Cawsey AJ, Barrett A, Craig N, et al. Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for cancer patients. BMJ 1999;319(7219):1241‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Lis 2009 {published data only}
    1. Lis CG, Rodeghier M, Gupta D. Distribution and determinants of patient satisfaction in oncology: A review of the literature. Patient Preference Adherence 2009;3:287‐304. - PMC - PubMed
Loiselle 2009 {published data only}
    1. Loiselle CG, Dubois S. The impact of a multimedia informational intervention on healthcare service use among women and men newly diagnosed with cancer. Cancer Nursing 2009;32(1):37‐44. - PubMed
Nissim 2009 {published data only}
    1. Nissim R, Regehr M, Rozmovits L, Rodin G. Transforming the experience of cancer care: a qualitative study of a hospital‐based volunteer psychosocial support service. Supportive Care in Cancer 2009;17(7):801‐9. - PubMed
Parsonnet 1990 {published data only}
    1. Parsonnet L, O'Hare J. A group orientation program for families of newly admitted cancer patients. Social Work 1990;35(1):37‐40. - PubMed
Rainey 1985 {published data only}
    1. Rainey LC. Effects of preparatory patient education for radiation oncology patients. Cancer 1985;56(5):1056‐61. - PubMed
Schofield 2008 {published data only}
    1. Schofield P, Jefford M, Carey M, Thomson K, Evans M, Baravelli C, et al. Preparing patients for threatening medical treatments: effects of a chemotherapy educational DVD on anxiety, unmet needs, and self‐efficacy. Supportive Care in Cancer 2008;16(1):37‐45. - PubMed
Sheldon 2008 {published data only}
    1. Sheldon LK, Swanson S, Dolce A, Marsh K, Summers J. Putting evidence into practice: evidence‐based interventions for anxiety. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing 2008;12(5):789‐97. - PubMed
Skalla 2004 {published data only}
    1. Skalla KA, Bakitas M, Furstenberg CT, Ahles T, Henderson J V. Patients' need for information about cancer therapy. Oncology Nursing Forum 2004;31(2):313‐9. - PubMed
Wells 1995 {published data only}
    1. Wells M, McQuellon R, Hinkle J, Cruz J. Reducing anxiety in newly diagnosed cancer patients‐ a pilot program. Cancer Practice 1995;3(2):100‐4. - PubMed

Additional references

Borras 2001
    1. Borras JM, Sanchez‐Hernandez A, Navarro M, Martinez M, Mendez E, Ponton JL, et al. Compliance, satisfaction, and quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer receiving home chemotherapy or outpatient treatment: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2001; Vol. 322, issue 7290:826. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7290.826] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Carelle 2002
    1. Carelle N, Piotto E, Bellanger A, Germanaud J, Thuillier A, Khayat D. Changing patients perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy. Cancer 2002;95:155‐63. - PubMed
Champman 2003
    1. Champman K, Rush K. Patient and family satisfaction with cancer‐related information: a review of the literature. Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal 2003;13:107‐16. - PubMed
Chelf 2001
    1. Chelf J, Agre P, Axelrod A, Cheney L, Cole D, Conrad K. Cancer related patient education: an overview of the last decade of evaluation and research. Oncology Nursing Forum 2001;28:1139‐47. - PubMed
Cochrane 2002
    1. The Cochrane Collaboration 2002. Additional Module 1: Meta‐analysis of continuous data. http://www.cochrane‐net.org/openlearning/PDF/Module_A1.pdf.
Dunn 2004
    1. Dunn J, Steginga SK, Rose P, Scott J, Allison R. Evaluating patient education materials about radiation therapy. Patient Education and Counseling 2004; Vol. 52, issue 3:325‐32. - PubMed
Higgins 2008
    1. Higgins J, Green S (Editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester: Wiley, 2008.
Jacobsen 2008
    1. Jacobsen PB, Jim HS. Psychosocial interventions for anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients: Achievements and challenges. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2008;58(4):214‐30. - PubMed
McPherson 2001
    1. McPherson C, Higginson I, Hearn J. Effective methods of giving information in cancer: a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Public Health Medicine 2001;23(3):227‐34. - PubMed
Mills 1999
    1. Mills ME, Sullivan K. The importance of information giving for patients newly diagnosed with cancer: a review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing 1999;8(6):631‐42. - PubMed
Moore 2004
    1. Moore PM, Wilkinson SSM, Rivera Mercado S. Communication skills training for health care professionals working with cancer patients, their families and/or carers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003751.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Nijboer 2000
    1. Nijboer C, Triemstra M, Tempelaar R, Mulder M, Sanderman R, Bos G. Patterns of caregiver experiences among partners of cancer patients. Gerontologist 2000;40:738‐46. - PubMed
Ranmal 2008
    1. Ranmal, R, Prctor M, Scott JT. Interventions for improving communication with children and adolescents about their cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002969.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Rees 2000
    1. Rees CE, Bath PA. The information needs and source preferences of women with breast cancer and their family members: a review of the literature published between 1988 and 1998. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2000;31:833‐41. - PubMed
Rodin 2007
    1. Rodin G, Lloyd N, Katz M, Green E, Mackay JA, Wong RK. The treatment of depression in cancer patients: a systematic review. Supportive Care in Cancer 2007; Vol. 15, issue 2:123‐36. - PubMed
Rutten 2005
    1. Finney Rutten LJ, Arora N, Bakos A, Aziz N, Rowland J. Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980‐2003). Patient Education and Counseling 2005;57:250‐61. - PubMed
Rutten 2006
    1. Finney Rutten LJ, Squiers L, Treiman K. Requests for information by family and friends of cancer patients calling the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service. Psycho‐Oncology 2006;15:664‐72. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.995] - DOI - PubMed
Ryan 2007
    1. Ryan R, Hill S, Broclain D, Horey D, Oliver S, Prictor M, Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group. Study Quality Guide. www.latrobe.edu.au/cochrane/resources.html (accessed 10 March 2009) March 2007.
Sellick 2007
    1. Sellick S, Edwardson A. Screening new cancer patients for psychological distress using the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Psycho‐Oncology 2007;16:534‐42. - PubMed
Sjöling 2003
    1. Sjöling M, Nordahl G, Olofsson N, Asplund K. The impact of preoperative information on state anxiety, postoperative pain and satisfaction with pain management. Patient Education and Counselling 2003;51(2):169‐76. - PubMed
WHO 2005
    1. World Health Organisation. Global Action Against Cancer Now. WHO, 2005. [ISBN 92 4 159314 8]
Wilson 2000
    1. Wilson FL, Baker LM, Brown‐Syed C, Gollop C. An analysis of the readability and cultural sensitivity of information on the National Cancer Institute's Web site: CancerNet. Oncology Nursing Forum 2000; Vol. 27, issue 9:1403‐9. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources