The primacy of public health considerations in defining poor quality medicines
- PMID: 22162953
- PMCID: PMC3232210
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001139
The primacy of public health considerations in defining poor quality medicines
Abstract
Paul Newton and colleagues argue that public health, and not intellectual property or trade issues, should be the prime consideration in defining and combating counterfeit medicines, and that the World Health Organization (WHO) should take a more prominent role.
Conflict of interest statement
PN and NJW have scientific collaborations with the Enforcement Working Group of IMPACT, and NJW is co-chair of the WHO malaria treatment guidelines committee but none of the authors have shares in pharmaceutical companies or works as a part of IMPACT. NJW is a member of the
Figures

References
-
- Wellcome Trust. Opinion formers' conference on counterfeit medicines: perspectives and action. 2009. Available: http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@policy_communic.... Accessed 10 October 2011.
-
- Fondation Chirac. The Cotonou Declaration. 2009. Available: http://www.fondationchirac.eu/en/the-cotonou-declaration-october-12-2009.... Accessed 10 October 2010.
-
- Newton PN, Green MD, Fernández FM, Day NJP, White NJ. Counterfeit anti-infective medicines. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:602–613. - PubMed
-
- Newton PN, McGready R, Fernandez F, Green MD, Sunjio M, et al. Manslaughter by fake artesunate in Asia–will Africa be next? PLoS Med. 2006;3:e197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030197. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical