Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011;4(2):154-172.
doi: 10.1080/19345747.2011.555294.

Effects of a Structured Decoding Curriculum on Adult Literacy Learners' Reading Development

Judith A Alamprese  1 , Charles A Macarthur, Cristofer Price, Deborah Knight
Affiliations

Effects of a Structured Decoding Curriculum on Adult Literacy Learners' Reading Development

Judith A Alamprese et al. J Res Educ Eff. 2011.

Abstract

This article reports the results from a randomized control field trial that investigated the impact of an enhanced decoding and spelling curriculum on the development of adult basic education (ABE) learners' reading skills. Sixteen ABE programs that offered class-based instruction to Low-Intermediate level learners were randomly assigned to either the treatment group or the control group. Reading instructors in the 8 treatment programs taught decoding and spelling using the study-developed curriculum, Making Sense of Decoding and Spelling (MSDS), and instructors in the 8 control programs used their existing reading instruction. A comparison group of 7 ABE programs whose instructors used K-3 structured curricula adapted for use with ABE learners were included for supplemental analyses. Seventy-one reading classes, 34 instructors, and 349 adult learners with pre- and posttests participated in the study. The study found a small but significant effect on one measure of decoding skills, which was the proximal target of the curriculum. No overall significant effects were found for word recognition, spelling, fluency, or comprehension. Pretest to posttest gains for word recognition were small to moderate, but not significantly better than the control classes. Adult learners who were born and educated outside of the U.S. made larger gains on 7 of the 11 reading measures than learners who were born and educated within the U.S. However, participation in the treatment curriculum was more beneficial for learners who were born and educated in the U.S. in developing their word recognition skills.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alamprese JA, Tao F, Price C. Study of reading instruction for low-level learners in adult basic education, v. 1. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates Inc.; 2003.
    1. Alamprese J. Research Triangle Institute, Alternative designs for evaluating workplace literacy programs. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 1993. Key components of workplace literacy projects and definition of project “models.”.
    1. Alamprese J. Developing learners’ reading skills in adult basic education programs. In: Reder S, Bynner J, editors. Tracking adult literacy and numeracy skills: Findings from longitudinal research. New York, NY: Routledge; 2009. pp. 107–131.
    1. Baer J, Kutner M, Sabatini J. Basic reading skills and the literacy of America’s least literate adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL) supplemental studies, (NCES 2009-481) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics; 2009.
    1. Bear DR, Invernizzi M, Templeton S, Johnston F. Words their way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, and spelling instruction. 3rd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill; 2004.

LinkOut - more resources