Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011;6(12):e28297.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028297. Epub 2011 Dec 7.

Phylogenetic status and timescale for the diversification of Steno and Sotalia dolphins

Affiliations

Phylogenetic status and timescale for the diversification of Steno and Sotalia dolphins

Haydée A Cunha et al. PLoS One. 2011.

Erratum in

  • PLoS One. 2012;7(8): doi/10.1371/annotation/e624380d-1b9c-4134-a68d-83629fbf26e1

Abstract

Molecular data have provided many insights into cetacean evolution but some unsettled issues still remain. We estimated the topology and timing of cetacean evolutionary relationships using bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses of complete mitochondrial genomes. In order to clarify the phylogenetic placement of Sotalia and Steno within the Delphinidae, we sequenced three new delphinid mitogenomes. Our analyses support three delphinid clades: one joining Steno and Sotalia (supporting the revised subfamily Stenoninae); another placing Sousa within the Delphininae; and a third, the Globicephalinae, which includes Globicephala, Feresa, Pseudorca, Peponocephala and Grampus. We also conclude that Orcinus does not belong in the Globicephalinae, but Orcaella may be part of that subfamily. Divergence dates were estimated using the relaxed molecular clock calibrated with fossil data. We hypothesise that the timing of separation of the marine and Amazonian Sotalia species (2.3 Ma) coincided with the establishment of the modern Amazon River basin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Phylogeny of Cetacea.
Support values represent PP/aLRT/BS. Nodes without information were supported by 100/100/100. (A) 61/52/*, (B) 100/80/*, (C) 55/89/*, (D) 100/91/73. (*) Indicates that RAxML BS is <50.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Timescale of Odontoceti evolution.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Calibration information used as priors in Bayesian dating analyses.
(a) TMRCA of modern Cetacea; (b) TMRCA of Odontoceti; (c) Age of the Monodon/Phocoena split; (d) Age of the Delphinidae diversification; (e) Age of the Iniidae/Pontoporidae divergence.

References

    1. Graur D, Higgins DG. Molecular Evidence for the Inclusion of Cetaceans within the Order Artiodactyla. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 1994;11:357–364. - PubMed
    1. Gatesy J, Hayashi C, Cronin MA, Arctander P. Evidence from milk casein genes that cetaceans are close relatives of hippopotamid artiodactyls. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 1996;13:954–963. - PubMed
    1. Nikaido M, Rooney AP, Okada N. Phylogenetic relationships among cetartiodactyls based on insertions of short and long interpersed elements: Hippopotamuses are the closest extant relatives of whales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999;96:10261–10266. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gatesy J, O'Leary MA. Deciphering whale origins with molecules and fossils. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2001;16:562–570.
    1. Agnarsson I, May-Collado LJ. The phylogeny of Cetartiodactyla: The importance of dense taxon sampling, missing data, and the remarkable promise of cytochrome b to provide reliable species-level phylogenies. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2008;48:964–985. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances