Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011;11(5):5469-88.
doi: 10.3390/s110505469. Epub 2011 May 19.

Cognitive facilitation following intentional odor exposure

Affiliations
Review

Cognitive facilitation following intentional odor exposure

Andrew J Johnson. Sensors (Basel). 2011.

Abstract

This paper reviews evidence that, in addition to incidental olfactory pollutants, intentional odor delivery can impact cognitive operations both positively and negatively. Evidence for cognitive facilitation/interference is reviewed alongside four potential explanations for odor-induced effects. It is concluded that the pharmacological properties of odors can induce changes in cognition. However, these effects can be accentuated/attenuated by the shift in mood following odor exposure, expectancy of cognitive effects, and cues to behavior via the contextual association with the odor. It is proposed that greater consideration is required in the intentional utilization of odors within both industrial and private locations, since differential effects are observed for odors with positive hedonic qualities.

Keywords: alertness; cognitive facilitation; essential oils; memory; odors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kim K-H. Experimental demonstration of masking phenomenon between competing odorants via an air dilution sensory test. Sensors. 2010;10:7287–7302. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim K-H. The averaging effect of odorant mixing via air dilution sensory test: A case study on reduced sulfur compounds. Sensors. 2011;11:1405–1417. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim K-H, Park S-Y. A comparative analysis of malodor samples between direct (olfactometry) and indirect (instrumental) methods. Atmos. Environ. 2008;42:5061–5070.
    1. Rotton J. Affective and cognitive consequences of malodorous pollution. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1983;4:171–191.
    1. Moss M, Cook J, Wesnes K, Duckett P. Aromas of rosemary and lavender essential oils differentially affect cognition and mood in healthy adults. Int. J. Neurosci. 2003;113:15–38. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources