Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Dec 13:8:66.
doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-8-66.

Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach

Affiliations
Review

Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach

Juan-Manuel Belda-Lois et al. J Neuroeng Rehabil. .

Abstract

This document provides a review of the techniques and therapies used in gait rehabilitation after stroke. It also examines the possible benefits of including assistive robotic devices and brain-computer interfaces in this field, according to a top-down approach, in which rehabilitation is driven by neural plasticity.The methods reviewed comprise classical gait rehabilitation techniques (neurophysiological and motor learning approaches), functional electrical stimulation (FES), robotic devices, and brain-computer interfaces (BCI).From the analysis of these approaches, we can draw the following conclusions. Regarding classical rehabilitation techniques, there is insufficient evidence to state that a particular approach is more effective in promoting gait recovery than other. Combination of different rehabilitation strategies seems to be more effective than over-ground gait training alone. Robotic devices need further research to show their suitability for walking training and their effects on over-ground gait. The use of FES combined with different walking retraining strategies has shown to result in improvements in hemiplegic gait. Reports on non-invasive BCIs for stroke recovery are limited to the rehabilitation of upper limbs; however, some works suggest that there might be a common mechanism which influences upper and lower limb recovery simultaneously, independently of the limb chosen for the rehabilitation therapy. Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) enables researchers to detect signals from specific regions of the cortex during performance of motor activities for the development of future BCIs. Future research would make possible to analyze the impact of rehabilitation on brain plasticity, in order to adapt treatment resources to meet the needs of each patient and to optimize the recovery process.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Schmidt H, Werner C, Bernhardt R, Hesse S, Krüger J. Gait rehabilitation machines based on programmable footplates. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2007;4 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Therapy Impact on Functional Recovery in Stroke Rehabilitation:: A critical review of the literature. Physiotherapy. 1999;85:377–391.
    1. Evers SM, Struijs JN, Ament AJ, van Genugten ML, Jager JC, van den Bos GA. International comparison of stroke cost studies. Stroke. 2004;35:1209–1215. - PubMed
    1. Schaechter JD. Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke. Progress in neurobiology. 2004;73:61–72. - PubMed
    1. Flansbjer UB, Holmbäck AM, Downham D, Patten C, Lexell J. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2005;37:75–82. - PubMed

Publication types