Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Feb;91(2):227-33.
doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.217. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

Pgp-mediated interaction between (R)-[11C]verapamil and tariquidar at the human blood-brain barrier: a comparison with rat data

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Pgp-mediated interaction between (R)-[11C]verapamil and tariquidar at the human blood-brain barrier: a comparison with rat data

M Bauer et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Using positron emission tomography (PET) imaging we assessed, in vivo, the interaction between a microdose of (R)-[(11)C]verapamil (a P-glycoprotein (Pgp) substrate) and escalating doses of the Pgp inhibitor tariquidar (3, 4, 6, and 8 mg/kg) at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in healthy human subjects. We compared the dose-response relationship of tariquidar in humans with data obtained in rats using a similar methodology. Tariquidar was equipotent in humans and rats in its effect of increasing (R)-[(11)C]verapamil brain uptake (expressed as whole-brain volume of distribution (V(T))), with very similar half-maximum-effect concentrations. Both in humans and in rats, brain V(T) approached plateau levels at plasma tariquidar concentrations >1,000 ng/ml. However, Pgp inhibition in humans led to only a 2.7-fold increase in brain V(T) relative to baseline scans (before administration of tariquidar) as compared with 11.0-fold in rats. The results of this translational study add to the accumulating evidence that there are marked species-dependent differences in Pgp expression and functionality at the BBB.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean time-activity curves (standardized uptake value, SUV ±standard deviation, SD) of unmetabolized (R)-[11C]verapamil in arterial plasma from 3.5 to 40 min after radiotracer injection for baseline scans (i.e. without tariquidar administration, n=5) and scans after administration of 2 mg/kg tariquidar (n=5) and from 3.5 to 60 min after radiotracer injection for scans after administration of 3, 4, 6 and 8 mg/kg tariquidar (n=3 per dose group).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative transaxial MRIs merged with (R)-[11C]verapamil PET summation images (0-40 min) for a baseline scan (a, taken from reference (17)) and scans after administration of tariquidar at a dose of 3 mg/kg (b) and 8 mg/kg (c). Activity concentration is expressed as standardized uptake value (SUV) and radiation scale is set from 0.1 to 3.0. Anatomical structures are labeled using white arrows (v, ventricle; p, choroid plexus; s, venous sinus).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean time-activity curves (standardized uptake value, SUV±SD) of (R)-[11C]verapamil in whole brain grey matter from 0 to 40 min after radiotracer injection for baseline scans (i.e. without tariquidar administration, n=5) and scans after administration of 2 mg/kg tariquidar (n=5) and from 0 to 60 min after radiotracer injection for scans after administration of 3, 4, 6 and 8 mg/kg tariquidar (n=3 per dose group).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relationship between tariquidar plasma levels (ng/mL) at the end of the PET scan and (R)-[11C]verapamil whole brain volume of distribution VT-VT at baseline and influx rate constant K1-K1 at baseline derived from 2-tissue-4-rate constant compartment model from 0-40 min in humans (a, b) and from 0-60 min in Sprague-Dawley rats (c,d) (19) and corresponding sigmoidal fits using the Hill function.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Giacomini KM, et al. Membrane transporters in drug development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010;9:215–236. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chinn LW, Kroetz DL. ABCB1 pharmacogenetics: progress, pitfalls, and promise. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2007;81:265–269. - PubMed
    1. Löscher W, Potschka H. Role of drug efflux transporters in the brain for drug disposition and treatment of brain diseases. Prog. Neurobiol. 2005;76:22–76. - PubMed
    1. Hammarlund-Udenaes M, Bredberg U, Friden M. Methodologies to assess brain drug delivery in lead optimization. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2009;9:148–162. - PubMed
    1. Uchida Y, et al. Quantitative targeted absolute proteomics of human blood-brain barrier transporters and receptors. J. Neurochem. 2011;117:333–345. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms