Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Jan;95(1):212-9.
doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.022525. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

A novel fortified blended flour, corn-soy blend "plus-plus," is not inferior to lipid-based ready-to-use supplementary foods for the treatment of moderate acute malnutrition in Malawian children

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A novel fortified blended flour, corn-soy blend "plus-plus," is not inferior to lipid-based ready-to-use supplementary foods for the treatment of moderate acute malnutrition in Malawian children

Lacey N LaGrone et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Children with moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) are often treated with fortified blended flours, most commonly a corn-soy blend (CSB). However, recovery rates remain <75%, lower than the rate achieved with peanut paste-based ready-to-use supplementary foods (RUSFs). To bridge this gap, a novel CSB recipe fortified with oil and dry skim milk, "CSB++," has been developed.

Objective: In this trial we compared CSB++ with 2 RUSF products for the treatment of MAM to test the hypothesis that the recovery rate achieved with CSB++ will not be >5% worse than that achieved with either RUSF.

Design: We conducted a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, controlled noninferiority trial involving rural Malawian children aged 6-59 mo with MAM. Children received 75 kcal CSB++ · kg(-1) · d(-1), locally produced soy RUSF, or an imported soy/whey RUSF for ≤12 wk.

Results: The recovery rate for CSB++ (n = 763 of 888; 85.9%) was similar to that for soy RUSF (795 of 806, 87.7%; risk difference: -1.82%; 95% CI: -4.95%, 1.30%) and soy/whey RUSF (807 of 918, 87.9%; risk difference: -1.99%; 95% CI: -5.10%, 1.13%). On average, children who received CSB++ required 2 d longer to recover, and the rate of weight gain was less than that with either RUSF, although height gain was the same among all 3 foods studied.

Conclusions: A novel, locally produced, fortified blended flour (CSB++) was not inferior to a locally produced soy RUSF and an imported soy/whey RUSF in facilitating recovery from MAM. The recovery rate observed for CSB++ was higher than that for any other fortified blended flour tested previously. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00998517.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Flow of participants throughout the study. *CSB++, corn-soy blend “plus-plus.” RUSF, ready-to-use supplementary food. MAM, moderate acute malnutrition. **SAM, severe acute malnutrition.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Recovery of children with moderate acute malnutrition treated with 1 of 3 supplementary foods. Log-rank test for trend, P ≈ 0.13. *CSB++, corn-soy blend “plus-plus”; RUSF, ready-to-use supplementary food.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Black RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA, Caulfield LE, de Onis M, Ezzati M, Mathers C, Rivera J. Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet 2008;371:243–60 - PubMed
    1. Shankar AH. Nutritional modulation of malaria morbidity and mortality. J Infect Dis 2000;182(suppl 1):S37–53 - PubMed
    1. Berkman DS, Lescano AG, Gilman RH, Lopez SL, Black MM. Effects of stunting, diarrhoeal disease, and parasitic infection during infancy on cognition in late childhood: a follow-up study. Lancet 2002;359:564–71 - PubMed
    1. Fishman SCL, de Onis M, Blossner M, Mullany L, Black RE. Malnutrition and the global burden of disease: underweight. Cambridge, MA: World Health Organization/Harvard University Press, 2003
    1. Marchione TJ. Foods provided through U.S. Government Emergency Food Aid Programs: policies and customs governing their formulation, selection and distribution. J Nutr 2002;132:2104S–11S - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data