Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Nov 10;75(9):175.
doi: 10.5688/ajpe759175.

Pharmacy student impact on inappropriate prescribing of acid suppressive therapy

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Pharmacy student impact on inappropriate prescribing of acid suppressive therapy

Katherine M Carey et al. Am J Pharm Educ. .

Abstract

Objective: To examine the impact that having pharmacy students on internal medicine patient care teams had on inappropriate prescribing of acid suppressive therapy (AST).

Methods: In this observational cohort study, internal medicine patients who received care from teams with a pharmacy student were compared to patients who received care from teams without a pharmacy student. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients on inappropriate AST.

Results: The overall proportion of patients receiving inappropriate AST was 24.4%. There was no significant difference between patients seen by teams with a pharmacy student and those seen by teams without a pharmacy student. The proportion of patients discharged with new inappropriate AST prescriptions was lower after pharmacy student review, though not significantly (6.1% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.07). Pharmacy student reviews shortened the median duration of inappropriate AST by 1.5 days (6 vs. 8.5 days, p = 0.025).

Conclusions: Patient care teams on which pharmacy students performed medication reviews had a reduced duration of inappropriate use of AST in patients.

Keywords: acid suppressive therapy; pharmacy students; prescribing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Appropriate AST indication by type of medical team (*P < 0.05). Abbreviations: G1 = gastrointestinal; GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kleiman RL, Adair CG, Ephgrave KS. Stress ulcers: current understanding of pathogenesis and prophylaxis. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1988;22(6):452–460. - PubMed
    1. Heidelbaugh JJ, Inadomi JM. Magnitude and economic impact of inappropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis in non-ICU hospitalized patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(10):2200–2205. - PubMed
    1. Navab F, Steingrub J. Stress ulcer: is routine prophylaxis necessary? Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90(5):708–712. - PubMed
    1. Lamb E. Top 200 Drugs of 2008. Pharmacy Times. May 2009. http://www.pharmacytimes.com/issue/pharmacy/2009/2009-05/RxFocusTop200Dr.... Accessed September 12, 2011.
    1. Wohlt PD, Hansen LA, Fish JT. Inappropriate continuation of stress ulcer prophylactic therapy after discharge. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41(10):1611–1616. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources